This page compares the source lines of code (SLOC) of Alamofire/Alamofire and Moya/Moya using cached OctoCounts reports. Code size is not code quality: a larger count only means more source material, not a better or worse project.
As of 2026-08-26, Alamofire/Alamofire contains 50,312 total lines (27,119 code) across 129 files, while Moya/Moya contains 12,456 total lines (7,635 code) across 117 files as of 2026-08-26. Alamofire/Alamofire is about 3.6x the size of Moya/Moya by code lines. Code size is not code quality: a larger count only means more source material, not a better or worse project.
| Metric | Alamofire/Alamofire | Moya/Moya |
|---|---|---|
| Files | 129 | 117 |
| Total lines | 50,312 | 12,456 |
| Code lines | 27,119 | 7,635 |
| Comment lines | 14,396 | 2,274 |
| Blank lines | 8,797 | 2,547 |
| Languages counted | 4 | 7 |
Top languages in Alamofire/Alamofire: Swift (98.1% of code), JSON (1.9% of code), Markdown (0.0% of code). Top languages in Moya/Moya: Swift (96.3% of code), Rakefile (1.9% of code), Shell (0.8% of code). Swift, JSON appear in both top language lists; Markdown, Plain Text appear only in Alamofire/Alamofire's top languages; Rakefile, Shell, C Header appear only in Moya/Moya's top languages.
Methodology: both counts come from cached OctoCounts reports generated with tokei. Alamofire/Alamofire was counted at ref master (commit 0455bfb65089) on 2026-08-26; Moya/Moya was counted at ref master (commit 24c26671a2f0) on 2026-08-26. See the counting methodology for ignored directories and analysis options.
Evidence and next steps:
Note: code size is not code quality. OctoCounts only reports reproducible line counts and makes no claim that either project is better.
Alamofire/Alamofire has more code: 27,119 code lines versus 7,635 for Moya/Moya, about 3.6x as much, based on cached OctoCounts reports as of 2026-08-26.
Not necessarily. SLOC measures size, not complexity, quality, or maintainability. A larger codebase can mean more features, more generated or vendored code, more verbose language idioms, or more tests — none of which imply the code is harder to work with. Use SLOC to gauge the scale of what you'd be reading or maintaining, not as a quality signal for Alamofire/Alamofire, Moya/Moya, or any repository.
Methodology: both counts come from cached OctoCounts reports generated with tokei. Alamofire/Alamofire was counted at ref master (commit 0455bfb65089) on 2026-08-26; Moya/Moya was counted at ref master (commit 24c26671a2f0) on 2026-08-26. See the counting methodology for ignored directories and analysis options.
Yes. This page shows the default branch for each repository. Use the interactive comparison tool to pick any public GitHub repository, branch, tag, or commit SHA for both sides and get a fresh side-by-side report.