# AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo SLOC report

> AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo: 20,430 code lines at commit fc1f5f682ed0, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-17. Saved result a08e69bbc76d574f51ff9b259330e2d2b0a30d641c6b0e61d2c1a296208547c8.

AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo has 20,430 source lines of code out of 31,215 total lines across 167 files, counted from the fc1f5f682ed02b6a758a3a77c55fe27cfa205d3e ref at commit fc1f5f682ed0 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo to commit fc1f5f682ed0, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 65.4% of all lines, comments represent 18.6%, and the repository averages 122 code lines per file. Python accounts for 93.7% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 119 | 23,467 | 19,143 | 879 | 3,445 |
| YAML | 12 | 845 | 628 | 165 | 52 |
| TOML | 5 | 296 | 246 | 11 | 39 |
| Dockerfile | 3 | 383 | 240 | 86 | 57 |
| Makefile | 3 | 205 | 131 | 36 | 38 |
| Shell | 2 | 74 | 42 | 22 | 10 |
| Markdown | 21 | 4,415 | 0 | 3,101 | 1,314 |
| Plain Text | 2 | 1,530 | 0 | 1,497 | 33 |

Top language (Python 93.7%). Generated at 2026-10-17T18:56:33.907858728Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo/commit/fc1f5f682ed02b6a758a3a77c55fe27cfa205d3e?reportId=a08e69bbc76d574f51ff9b259330e2d2b0a30d641c6b0e61d2c1a296208547c8&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo/commit/fc1f5f682ed02b6a758a3a77c55fe27cfa205d3e?reportId=a08e69bbc76d574f51ff9b259330e2d2b0a30d641c6b0e61d2c1a296208547c8&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo have?

AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo has 31,215 total lines, including 20,430 code lines, 5,797 comment lines, and 4,988 blank lines.

### How was the AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit fc1f5f682ed0, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo?

This OctoCounts report was generated from fc1f5f682ed02b6a758a3a77c55fe27cfa205d3e at commit fc1f5f682ed0 on 2026-10-17T18:56:33.907858728Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [mvt-project/mvt](https://octocounts.com/github/mvt-project/mvt) — Python, 20,510 code lines
- [sabbour/followcursor](https://octocounts.com/github/sabbour/followcursor) — Python, 20,326 code lines
- [coleifer/peewee](https://octocounts.com/github/coleifer/peewee) — Python, 20,590 code lines
- [zilliztech/memsearch](https://octocounts.com/github/zilliztech/memsearch) — Python, 20,263 code lines
- [GaimsDevSoftware/linuxpop](https://octocounts.com/github/GaimsDevSoftware/linuxpop) — Python, 20,165 code lines
- [tw93/Waza](https://octocounts.com/github/tw93/Waza) — Python, 20,718 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)