BurntSushi/byteorder SLOC report

As of 2026-05-17 (commit 5a82625fae46), BurntSushi/byteorder contains 3,544 total lines: 2,933 code, 229 comments, 382 blank, across 7 files in 3 languages (top: Rust 99.0%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

As of 2026-05-17 (commit 5a82625fae46), BurntSushi/byteorder contains 3,544 total lines: 2,933 code, 229 comments, 382 blank, across 7 files in 3 languages (top: Rust 99.0%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving BurntSushi/byteorder to commit 5a82625fae46, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 82.8% of all lines, comments represent 6.5%, and the repository averages 419 code lines per file. Rust accounts for 99.0% of counted code.

LanguageFilesLinesCodeCommentsBlanks
Rust33301290579317
TOML2362835
Markdown2207014760

Top language (Rust 99.0%). Generated at .

Report FAQ

How many lines of code does BurntSushi/byteorder have?

BurntSushi/byteorder has 3,544 total lines, including 2,933 code lines, 229 comment lines, and 382 blank lines.

How was the BurntSushi/byteorder line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 5a82625fae46, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

What commit was counted for BurntSushi/byteorder?

This OctoCounts report was generated from master at commit 5a82625fae46 on 2026-05-17T08:05:44.693780972+00:00.

Similar repository reports

Other public repositories with an OctoCounts report, ranked by top language and code size similarity: