# CTR-tools/ctr-native SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-21 (commit 3f5f6b8b28ce), CTR-tools/ctr-native contains 956,210 total lines: 721,626 code, 122,485 comments, 112,099 blank, across 2,173 files in 38 languages (top: C 55.1%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

CTR-tools/ctr-native has 721,626 source lines of code out of 956,210 total lines across 2,173 files, counted from the master ref at commit 3f5f6b8b28ce by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-21. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving CTR-tools/ctr-native to commit 3f5f6b8b28ce, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 75.5% of all lines, comments represent 12.8%, and the repository averages 332 code lines per file. C accounts for 55.1% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| C | 863 | 504,812 | 397,772 | 40,450 | 66,590 |
| C Header | 788 | 323,120 | 220,681 | 69,526 | 32,913 |
| Objective-C | 44 | 27,425 | 20,993 | 2,462 | 3,970 |
| Bitbake | 9 | 15,234 | 15,130 | 53 | 51 |
| XML | 28 | 11,557 | 10,500 | 68 | 989 |
| JSON | 4 | 10,363 | 10,363 | 0 | 0 |
| Python | 37 | 11,814 | 10,087 | 318 | 1,409 |
| CMake | 41 | 11,129 | 8,943 | 1,067 | 1,119 |
| C++ | 38 | 10,336 | 7,660 | 1,177 | 1,499 |
| Perl | 7 | 5,845 | 4,842 | 375 | 628 |
| Java | 12 | 6,066 | 4,459 | 802 | 805 |
| Visual Studio Project | 59 | 3,773 | 3,773 | 0 | 0 |

Top language (C 55.1%). Generated at 2026-10-21T04:03:12.432861517+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/CTR-tools/ctr-native

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/CTR-tools/ctr-native/commit/3f5f6b8b28cee1d3501c420e83c11585505b4e2b?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=db07a880cb831c0ce477facfc26f87a078edc04e5a93ccd7680d8c5b760eae74).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does CTR-tools/ctr-native have?

CTR-tools/ctr-native has 956,210 total lines, including 721,626 code lines, 122,485 comment lines, and 112,099 blank lines.

### How was the CTR-tools/ctr-native line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 3f5f6b8b28ce, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for CTR-tools/ctr-native?

This OctoCounts report was generated from master at commit 3f5f6b8b28ce on 2026-10-21T04:03:12.432861517+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [FlightGear/flightgear](https://octocounts.com/github/FlightGear/flightgear) — C, 711,770 code lines
- [neovim/neovim](https://octocounts.com/github/neovim/neovim) — C, 733,184 code lines
- [OpenCommunityEdition/OpenCE](https://octocounts.com/github/OpenCommunityEdition/OpenCE) — C, 744,482 code lines
- [ChupathingyCE/chupathingyce](https://octocounts.com/github/ChupathingyCE/chupathingyce) — C, 753,872 code lines
- [openssl/openssl](https://octocounts.com/github/openssl/openssl) — C, 785,336 code lines
- [uroni/urbackup_backend](https://octocounts.com/github/uroni/urbackup_backend) — C, 843,604 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [Neovim vs VS Code](https://octocounts.com/compare/neovim-vs-vscode)
- [MongoDB vs PostgreSQL](https://octocounts.com/compare/mongodb-vs-postgres)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)