# ESOSK/openmc SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-16 (commit bce5d92d9a04), ESOSK/openmc contains 207,284 total lines: 155,479 code, 26,045 comments, 25,760 blank, across 465 files in 14 languages (top: Python 55.1%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

ESOSK/openmc has 155,479 source lines of code out of 207,284 total lines across 465 files, counted from the develop ref at commit bce5d92d9a04 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-16. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving ESOSK/openmc to commit bce5d92d9a04, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 75.0% of all lines, comments represent 12.6%, and the repository averages 334 code lines per file. Python accounts for 55.1% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 147 | 104,228 | 85,670 | 6,043 | 12,515 |
| C++ | 128 | 68,344 | 50,411 | 9,181 | 8,752 |
| C Header | 141 | 20,595 | 10,560 | 5,929 | 4,106 |
| JSON | 2 | 7,655 | 7,655 | 0 | 0 |
| CMake | 6 | 880 | 610 | 146 | 124 |
| Shell | 10 | 251 | 172 | 34 | 45 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 229 | 162 | 33 | 34 |
| Autoconf | 3 | 120 | 94 | 8 | 18 |
| TOML | 1 | 79 | 73 | 0 | 6 |
| XML | 1 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 0 |
| C++ Header | 1 | 62 | 18 | 31 | 13 |
| INI | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |

Top language (Python 55.1%). Generated at 2026-10-16T06:36:57.150826341+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/ESOSK/openmc

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/ESOSK/openmc/commit/bce5d92d9a04dbc3588f5d4f18730bd2f5ba1fa3?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=d08143581c6a06c25db0e613b358f89966ae2811a876ca14775db5defc7862e5).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does ESOSK/openmc have?

ESOSK/openmc has 207,284 total lines, including 155,479 code lines, 26,045 comment lines, and 25,760 blank lines.

### How was the ESOSK/openmc line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit bce5d92d9a04, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for ESOSK/openmc?

This OctoCounts report was generated from develop at commit bce5d92d9a04 on 2026-10-16T06:36:57.150826341+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [trpc-group/trpc-agent-python](https://octocounts.com/github/trpc-group/trpc-agent-python) — Python, 155,618 code lines
- [openmc-dev/openmc](https://octocounts.com/github/openmc-dev/openmc) — Python, 156,577 code lines
- [MattiaRubino/dante](https://octocounts.com/github/MattiaRubino/dante) — Python, 158,476 code lines
- [PoxenStudio/mybooks](https://octocounts.com/github/PoxenStudio/mybooks) — Python, 152,016 code lines
- [huggingface/text-generation-inference](https://octocounts.com/github/huggingface/text-generation-inference) — Python, 150,835 code lines
- [openai/openai-agents-python](https://octocounts.com/github/openai/openai-agents-python) — Python, 150,104 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)