# EverMind-AI/EverOS SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-22 (commit 87a8a6e419c8), EverMind-AI/EverOS contains 99,074 total lines: 79,894 code, 9,109 comments, 10,071 blank, across 477 files in 14 languages (top: Python 67.6%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

EverMind-AI/EverOS has 79,894 source lines of code out of 99,074 total lines across 477 files, counted from the main ref at commit 87a8a6e419c8 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-22. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving EverMind-AI/EverOS to commit 87a8a6e419c8, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 80.6% of all lines, comments represent 9.2%, and the repository averages 167 code lines per file. Python accounts for 67.6% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 358 | 63,881 | 54,004 | 2,764 | 7,113 |
| JSON | 17 | 18,131 | 18,128 | 0 | 3 |
| TypeScript | 18 | 3,333 | 2,643 | 276 | 414 |
| JavaScript | 18 | 3,031 | 2,047 | 564 | 420 |
| CSS | 1 | 1,287 | 1,084 | 29 | 174 |
| TSX | 9 | 1,032 | 918 | 14 | 100 |
| TOML | 15 | 1,296 | 626 | 549 | 121 |
| Shell | 4 | 287 | 197 | 54 | 36 |
| HTML | 4 | 139 | 131 | 2 | 6 |
| Makefile | 1 | 148 | 90 | 35 | 23 |
| Dockerfile | 2 | 37 | 22 | 7 | 8 |
| YAML | 2 | 43 | 4 | 37 | 2 |

Top language (Python 67.6%). Generated at 2026-10-22T06:25:16.178157694+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/EverMind-AI/EverOS

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/EverMind-AI/EverOS/commit/87a8a6e419c8d562f6c09b8d9117a1b39aa24955?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=da0171278312fcc446de1ac75e8b31fadb228de7914fd6bc80360324ac10830c).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does EverMind-AI/EverOS have?

EverMind-AI/EverOS has 99,074 total lines, including 79,894 code lines, 9,109 comment lines, and 10,071 blank lines.

### How was the EverMind-AI/EverOS line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 87a8a6e419c8, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for EverMind-AI/EverOS?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 87a8a6e419c8 on 2026-10-22T06:25:16.178157694+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [github/spec-kit](https://octocounts.com/github/github/spec-kit) — Python, 79,866 code lines
- [mlc-ai/mlc-llm](https://octocounts.com/github/mlc-ai/mlc-llm) — Python, 79,941 code lines
- [swat-model/swatplus-editor](https://octocounts.com/github/swat-model/swatplus-editor) — Python, 80,731 code lines
- [e2b-dev/e2b](https://octocounts.com/github/e2b-dev/e2b) — Python, 81,298 code lines
- [michaelegner/architecture-intelligence-platform](https://octocounts.com/github/michaelegner/architecture-intelligence-platform) — Python, 81,575 code lines
- [langchain-ai/langgraph](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/langgraph) — Python, 81,770 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)