# FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-16 (commit b995104cff1d), FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch contains 8,944 total lines: 6,540 code, 1,001 comments, 1,403 blank, across 96 files in 8 languages (top: Python 77.3%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch has 6,540 source lines of code out of 8,944 total lines across 96 files, counted from the b995104cff1dd488cdcc1517bc284649d9252d88 ref at commit b995104cff1d by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-16. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch to commit b995104cff1d, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 73.1% of all lines, comments represent 11.2%, and the repository averages 68 code lines per file. Python accounts for 77.3% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 71 | 6,173 | 5,054 | 186 | 933 |
| Jupyter Notebooks | 1 | 1,649 | 1,123 | 311 | 215 |
| JSON | 16 | 202 | 202 | 0 | 0 |
| YAML | 1 | 95 | 88 | 2 | 5 |
| Shell | 2 | 78 | 45 | 23 | 10 |
| TOML | 1 | 42 | 28 | 10 | 4 |
| Markdown | 2 | 676 | 0 | 442 | 234 |
| Plain Text | 2 | 29 | 0 | 27 | 2 |

Top language (Python 77.3%). Generated at 2026-09-16T20:20:28.295272746+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch/commit/b995104cff1dd488cdcc1517bc284649d9252d88?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch have?

FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch has 8,944 total lines, including 6,540 code lines, 1,001 comment lines, and 1,403 blank lines.

### How was the FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit b995104cff1d, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for FareedKhan-dev/train-llm-from-scratch?

This OctoCounts report was generated from b995104cff1dd488cdcc1517bc284649d9252d88 at commit b995104cff1d on 2026-09-16T20:20:28.295272746+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [oritera/Cairn](https://octocounts.com/github/oritera/Cairn) — Python, 6,482 code lines
- [Panniantong/Agent-Reach](https://octocounts.com/github/Panniantong/Agent-Reach) — Python, 6,619 code lines
- [tuna/tunasync-scripts](https://octocounts.com/github/tuna/tunasync-scripts) — Python, 6,630 code lines
- [snakers4/silero-vad](https://octocounts.com/github/snakers4/silero-vad) — Python, 6,657 code lines
- [hkproj/torchfeather](https://octocounts.com/github/hkproj/torchfeather) — Python, 6,389 code lines
- [yoheinakajima/babyagi](https://octocounts.com/github/yoheinakajima/babyagi) — Python, 6,714 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)