# Gerate-Technik/zkgram SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-13 (commit 7f1caf6e7c86), Gerate-Technik/zkgram contains 590,051 total lines: 495,342 code, 38,733 comments, 55,976 blank, across 2,123 files in 20 languages (top: C++ 69.4%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

Gerate-Technik/zkgram has 495,342 source lines of code out of 590,051 total lines across 2,123 files, counted from the 7f1caf6e7c865b9e3aa27db1758c77ceef434089 ref at commit 7f1caf6e7c86 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-13. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving Gerate-Technik/zkgram to commit 7f1caf6e7c86, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 83.9% of all lines, comments represent 6.6%, and the repository averages 233 code lines per file. C++ accounts for 69.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| C++ | 607 | 385,681 | 343,982 | 10,675 | 31,024 |
| C Header | 725 | 95,580 | 71,079 | 9,596 | 14,905 |
| C++ Header | 333 | 64,763 | 47,404 | 10,361 | 6,998 |
| JSON | 5 | 16,977 | 16,976 | 0 | 1 |
| CMake | 107 | 7,610 | 5,775 | 1,036 | 799 |
| Objective-C++ | 22 | 3,951 | 3,099 | 267 | 585 |
| C | 9 | 4,415 | 3,015 | 915 | 485 |
| SVG | 255 | 1,931 | 1,931 | 0 | 0 |
| Makefile | 1 | 699 | 514 | 88 | 97 |
| HTML | 2 | 352 | 336 | 0 | 16 |
| Shell | 4 | 463 | 315 | 86 | 62 |
| XML | 8 | 338 | 303 | 26 | 9 |

Top language (C++ 69.4%). Generated at 2026-10-13T07:09:30.262581394+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/Gerate-Technik/zkgram

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/Gerate-Technik/zkgram/commit/7f1caf6e7c865b9e3aa27db1758c77ceef434089?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=b92ec59118f0fa9918ab4f5f102974a2c4fc3d49ab3dcdb25216e4580af7f664).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does Gerate-Technik/zkgram have?

Gerate-Technik/zkgram has 590,051 total lines, including 495,342 code lines, 38,733 comment lines, and 55,976 blank lines.

### How was the Gerate-Technik/zkgram line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 7f1caf6e7c86, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for Gerate-Technik/zkgram?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 7f1caf6e7c865b9e3aa27db1758c77ceef434089 at commit 7f1caf6e7c86 on 2026-10-13T07:09:30.262581394+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [harry7557558/spirula-studio](https://octocounts.com/github/harry7557558/spirula-studio) — C++, 499,013 code lines
- [pointcloudlibrary/pcl](https://octocounts.com/github/pointcloudlibrary/pcl) — C++, 515,670 code lines
- [PointCloudLibrary/pcl](https://octocounts.com/github/PointCloudLibrary/pcl) — C++, 515,757 code lines
- [houmo-ai/llama.cpp](https://octocounts.com/github/houmo-ai/llama.cpp) — C++, 464,090 code lines
- [RPCS3/rpcs3](https://octocounts.com/github/RPCS3/rpcs3) — C++, 531,455 code lines
- [chromium/openscreen](https://octocounts.com/github/chromium/openscreen) — C++, 544,947 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Electron vs Tauri](https://octocounts.com/compare/electron-vs-tauri)
- [Godot vs Bevy](https://octocounts.com/compare/godot-vs-bevy)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)