# GlacieTeam/RapidNBT SLOC report

> As of 2026-07-13 (commit e396ad3444f3), GlacieTeam/RapidNBT contains 6,162 total lines: 5,012 code, 384 comments, 766 blank, across 53 files in 7 languages (top: Python 50.9%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving GlacieTeam/RapidNBT to commit e396ad3444f3, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 81.3% of all lines, comments represent 6.2%, and the repository averages 95 code lines per file. Python accounts for 50.9% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 29 | 3,239 | 2,552 | 177 | 510 |
| C++ | 19 | 2,554 | 2,241 | 114 | 199 |
| Lua | 1 | 94 | 87 | 0 | 7 |
| C++ Header | 1 | 89 | 72 | 6 | 11 |
| TOML | 1 | 63 | 56 | 0 | 7 |
| Autoconf | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1 | 119 | 0 | 87 | 32 |

Top language (Python 50.9%). Generated at 2026-07-13T12:18:59.114826806+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/GlacieTeam/RapidNBT

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does GlacieTeam/RapidNBT have?

GlacieTeam/RapidNBT has 6,162 total lines, including 5,012 code lines, 384 comment lines, and 766 blank lines.

### How was the GlacieTeam/RapidNBT line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit e396ad3444f3, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for GlacieTeam/RapidNBT?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit e396ad3444f3 on 2026-07-13T12:18:59.114826806+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [LittleNightSong/RapidNBT](https://octocounts.com/github/LittleNightSong/RapidNBT) — Python, 5,012 code lines
- [mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels](https://octocounts.com/github/mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels) — Python, 5,001 code lines
- [vsecoder/github-notifi-bot](https://octocounts.com/github/vsecoder/github-notifi-bot) — Python, 5,036 code lines
- [plbrault/youre-the-os](https://octocounts.com/github/plbrault/youre-the-os) — Python, 5,058 code lines
- [xfangfang/Macast](https://octocounts.com/github/xfangfang/Macast) — Python, 4,966 code lines
- [ArThirtyFour/MXUserbot](https://octocounts.com/github/ArThirtyFour/MXUserbot) — Python, 5,079 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)