# IBM/mcp-context-forge SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-21 (commit cd7e9256e2ba), IBM/mcp-context-forge contains 441,184 total lines: 346,031 code, 48,723 comments, 46,430 blank, across 993 files in 19 languages (top: Python 66.9%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

IBM/mcp-context-forge has 346,031 source lines of code out of 441,184 total lines across 993 files, counted from the main ref at commit cd7e9256e2ba by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-21. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving IBM/mcp-context-forge to commit cd7e9256e2ba, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 78.4% of all lines, comments represent 11.0%, and the repository averages 348 code lines per file. Python accounts for 66.9% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 545 | 283,698 | 231,335 | 21,075 | 31,288 |
| JavaScript | 58 | 36,077 | 27,924 | 4,346 | 3,807 |
| HTML | 55 | 22,127 | 20,810 | 729 | 588 |
| JSON | 16 | 17,778 | 17,778 | 0 | 0 |
| YAML | 149 | 19,201 | 15,450 | 2,535 | 1,216 |
| Rust | 5 | 16,528 | 14,915 | 251 | 1,362 |
| Makefile | 6 | 11,252 | 8,491 | 1,527 | 1,234 |
| Shell | 26 | 5,164 | 3,547 | 993 | 624 |
| TOML | 14 | 3,773 | 2,997 | 283 | 493 |
| CSS | 4 | 1,681 | 1,274 | 118 | 289 |
| Jinja2 | 9 | 834 | 774 | 0 | 60 |
| Autoconf | 4 | 440 | 320 | 70 | 50 |

Top language (Python 66.9%). Generated at 2026-10-21T03:14:05.715018504+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/IBM/mcp-context-forge

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/IBM/mcp-context-forge/commit/cd7e9256e2ba9c1d1dccf01565041bfd12ceeb1c?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=6eb0856fc61167b33d132190099bbea6bc27f80d9246c859ea4b92071b5a8899).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does IBM/mcp-context-forge have?

IBM/mcp-context-forge has 441,184 total lines, including 346,031 code lines, 48,723 comment lines, and 46,430 blank lines.

### How was the IBM/mcp-context-forge line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit cd7e9256e2ba, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for IBM/mcp-context-forge?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit cd7e9256e2ba on 2026-10-21T03:14:05.715018504+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [abrignoni/iLEAPP](https://octocounts.com/github/abrignoni/iLEAPP) — Python, 354,327 code lines
- [jax-ml/jax](https://octocounts.com/github/jax-ml/jax) — Python, 358,273 code lines
- [angr/angr](https://octocounts.com/github/angr/angr) — Python, 334,007 code lines
- [bytedance/deer-flow](https://octocounts.com/github/bytedance/deer-flow) — Python, 359,037 code lines
- [angusdevgo/Seep-Reverse-Lab](https://octocounts.com/github/angusdevgo/Seep-Reverse-Lab) — Python, 361,758 code lines
- [alexgreensh/token-optimizer](https://octocounts.com/github/alexgreensh/token-optimizer) — Python, 362,438 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)