# Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-06 (commit 925975e933a2), Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex contains 959,014 total lines: 592,061 code, 225,857 comments, 141,096 blank, across 3,515 files in 11 languages (top: Python 73.6%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex to commit 925975e933a2, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 61.7% of all lines, comments represent 23.6%, and the repository averages 168 code lines per file. Python accounts for 73.6% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 842 | 516,090 | 435,708 | 23,418 | 56,964 |
| JSON | 1,032 | 150,444 | 150,212 | 0 | 232 |
| Shell | 16 | 4,324 | 2,440 | 1,548 | 336 |
| YAML | 36 | 1,966 | 1,620 | 240 | 106 |
| TOML | 4 | 1,318 | 950 | 54 | 314 |
| JavaScript | 4 | 788 | 686 | 2 | 100 |
| HTML | 1 | 218 | 209 | 0 | 9 |
| TeX | 2 | 398 | 172 | 134 | 92 |
| jq | 10 | 266 | 64 | 202 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1,526 | 282,172 | 0 | 199,473 | 82,699 |
| Plain Text | 42 | 1,030 | 0 | 786 | 244 |

Top language (Python 73.6%). Generated at 2026-09-06T08:46:43.474107539+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex have?

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex has 959,014 total lines, including 592,061 code lines, 225,857 comment lines, and 141,096 blank lines.

### How was the Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 925975e933a2, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 925975e933a2 on 2026-09-06T08:46:43.474107539+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [volcengine/OpenViking](https://octocounts.com/github/volcengine/OpenViking) — Python, 574,308 code lines
- [huangruiteng/loopx](https://octocounts.com/github/huangruiteng/loopx) — Python, 556,638 code lines
- [scipy/scipy](https://octocounts.com/github/scipy/scipy) — Python, 521,046 code lines
- [sefcom/oxidizer](https://octocounts.com/github/sefcom/oxidizer) — Python, 495,273 code lines
- [unslothai/unsloth](https://octocounts.com/github/unslothai/unsloth) — Python, 689,387 code lines
- [microsoft/pyright](https://octocounts.com/github/microsoft/pyright) — Python, 491,828 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)