# Imbad0202/academic-research-skills SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-16 (commit 3c546bc08c56), Imbad0202/academic-research-skills contains 480,006 total lines: 285,318 code, 124,388 comments, 70,300 blank, across 1,785 files in 10 languages (top: Python 77.6%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills has 285,318 source lines of code out of 480,006 total lines across 1,785 files, counted from the 3c546bc08c56f79e0068f1ea4f0acedf5bf69b5e ref at commit 3c546bc08c56 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-16. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving Imbad0202/academic-research-skills to commit 3c546bc08c56, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 59.4% of all lines, comments represent 25.9%, and the repository averages 160 code lines per file. Python accounts for 77.6% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 429 | 262,593 | 221,441 | 11,969 | 29,183 |
| JSON | 475 | 60,983 | 60,875 | 0 | 108 |
| Shell | 9 | 2,205 | 1,239 | 798 | 168 |
| YAML | 17 | 975 | 803 | 120 | 52 |
| TOML | 2 | 691 | 499 | 27 | 165 |
| JavaScript | 2 | 394 | 343 | 1 | 50 |
| TeX | 1 | 199 | 86 | 67 | 46 |
| jq | 5 | 133 | 32 | 101 | 0 |
| Markdown | 820 | 137,592 | 0 | 97,186 | 40,406 |
| Plain Text | 25 | 14,241 | 0 | 14,119 | 122 |

Top language (Python 77.6%). Generated at 2026-09-16T23:34:15.562115680+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills/commit/3c546bc08c56f79e0068f1ea4f0acedf5bf69b5e?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does Imbad0202/academic-research-skills have?

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills has 480,006 total lines, including 285,318 code lines, 124,388 comment lines, and 70,300 blank lines.

### How was the Imbad0202/academic-research-skills line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 3c546bc08c56, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 3c546bc08c56f79e0068f1ea4f0acedf5bf69b5e at commit 3c546bc08c56 on 2026-09-16T23:34:15.562115680+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [saleor/saleor](https://octocounts.com/github/saleor/saleor) — Python, 286,919 code lines
- [imbad0202/academic-research-skills](https://octocounts.com/github/imbad0202/academic-research-skills) — Python, 279,102 code lines
- [alexgreensh/token-optimizer](https://octocounts.com/github/alexgreensh/token-optimizer) — Python, 292,919 code lines
- [alirezarezvani/claude-skills](https://octocounts.com/github/alirezarezvani/claude-skills) — Python, 277,686 code lines
- [jundot/omlx](https://octocounts.com/github/jundot/omlx) — Python, 293,587 code lines
- [pandas-dev/pandas](https://octocounts.com/github/pandas-dev/pandas) — Python, 295,098 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)