# InnerAura/hyperweave SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-02 (commit d81d675a19cd), InnerAura/hyperweave contains 163,613 total lines: 135,436 code, 17,620 comments, 10,557 blank, across 523 files in 10 languages (top: Python 59.0%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

InnerAura/hyperweave has 135,436 source lines of code out of 163,613 total lines across 523 files, counted from the main ref at commit d81d675a19cd by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-02. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving InnerAura/hyperweave to commit d81d675a19cd, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 82.8% of all lines, comments represent 10.8%, and the repository averages 259 code lines per file. Python accounts for 59.0% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 213 | 98,327 | 79,906 | 9,705 | 8,716 |
| JSON | 26 | 23,512 | 23,512 | 0 | 0 |
| SVG | 73 | 21,788 | 21,243 | 138 | 407 |
| YAML | 41 | 8,029 | 5,325 | 2,515 | 189 |
| Jinja2 | 159 | 8,204 | 4,951 | 2,862 | 391 |
| CSS | 4 | 356 | 252 | 75 | 29 |
| TOML | 2 | 227 | 161 | 45 | 21 |
| Just | 1 | 167 | 75 | 49 | 43 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| Markdown | 3 | 2,989 | 0 | 2,228 | 761 |

Top language (Python 59.0%). Generated at 2026-09-02T23:59:44.545192872+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/InnerAura/hyperweave

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/InnerAura/hyperweave/commit/d81d675a19cdc0cda852c33943e69ec71dc634e1?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does InnerAura/hyperweave have?

InnerAura/hyperweave has 163,613 total lines, including 135,436 code lines, 17,620 comment lines, and 10,557 blank lines.

### How was the InnerAura/hyperweave line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit d81d675a19cd, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for InnerAura/hyperweave?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit d81d675a19cd on 2026-09-02T23:59:44.545192872+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [fla-org/flash-linear-attention](https://octocounts.com/github/fla-org/flash-linear-attention) — Python, 132,071 code lines
- [trpc-group/trpc-agent-python](https://octocounts.com/github/trpc-group/trpc-agent-python) — Python, 141,078 code lines
- [mesonbuild/meson](https://octocounts.com/github/mesonbuild/meson) — Python, 141,659 code lines
- [Dao-AILab/flash-attention](https://octocounts.com/github/Dao-AILab/flash-attention) — Python, 129,194 code lines
- [vitali87/code-graph-rag](https://octocounts.com/github/vitali87/code-graph-rag) — Python, 142,786 code lines
- [ansible/ansible](https://octocounts.com/github/ansible/ansible) — Python, 127,514 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)
