# K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-05 (commit 49c6e97775ea), K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills contains 508,001 total lines: 236,307 code, 181,023 comments, 90,671 blank, across 1,931 files in 10 languages (top: Python 63.3%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills has 236,307 source lines of code out of 508,001 total lines across 1,931 files, counted from the 49c6e97775eaa18ba791bebe23162a70ae601c18 ref at commit 49c6e97775ea by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-05. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills to commit 49c6e97775ea, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 46.5% of all lines, comments represent 35.6%, and the repository averages 122 code lines per file. Python accounts for 63.3% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 551 | 172,575 | 149,605 | 3,352 | 19,618 |
| JSON | 79 | 81,897 | 81,897 | 0 | 0 |
| TeX | 17 | 6,030 | 3,675 | 1,106 | 1,249 |
| YAML | 6 | 925 | 751 | 126 | 48 |
| Shell | 3 | 359 | 262 | 50 | 47 |
| HTML | 1 | 91 | 84 | 0 | 7 |
| TOML | 1 | 25 | 18 | 5 | 2 |
| XML | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1,262 | 245,962 | 0 | 176,282 | 69,680 |
| Plain Text | 6 | 122 | 0 | 102 | 20 |

Top language (Python 63.3%). Generated at 2026-10-05T21:34:21.556945953+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/commit/49c6e97775eaa18ba791bebe23162a70ae601c18?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills have?

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills has 508,001 total lines, including 236,307 code lines, 181,023 comment lines, and 90,671 blank lines.

### How was the K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 49c6e97775ea, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 49c6e97775eaa18ba791bebe23162a70ae601c18 at commit 49c6e97775ea on 2026-10-05T21:34:21.556945953+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [semantica-agi/semantica](https://octocounts.com/github/semantica-agi/semantica) — Python, 243,106 code lines
- [LMCache/LMCache](https://octocounts.com/github/LMCache/LMCache) — Python, 243,902 code lines
- [langchain-ai/open-swe](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/open-swe) — Python, 244,881 code lines
- [python/mypy](https://octocounts.com/github/python/mypy) — Python, 245,151 code lines
- [HKUDS/nanobot](https://octocounts.com/github/HKUDS/nanobot) — Python, 245,332 code lines
- [Ralph-Workflow/Ralph-Workflow](https://octocounts.com/github/Ralph-Workflow/Ralph-Workflow) — Python, 226,971 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)