# NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-22 (commit e18c059af3d0), NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails contains 124,047 total lines: 87,036 code, 19,105 comments, 17,906 blank, across 901 files in 14 languages (top: Python 79.2%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails has 87,036 source lines of code out of 124,047 total lines across 901 files, counted from the develop ref at commit e18c059af3d0 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-22. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails to commit e18c059af3d0, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 70.2% of all lines, comments represent 15.4%, and the repository averages 97 code lines per file. Python accounts for 79.2% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 530 | 94,323 | 68,921 | 11,610 | 13,792 |
| YAML | 199 | 10,244 | 8,618 | 582 | 1,044 |
| JSON | 16 | 6,770 | 6,770 | 0 | 0 |
| Jupyter Notebooks | 7 | 1,875 | 1,096 | 415 | 364 |
| JavaScript | 6 | 812 | 702 | 8 | 102 |
| TOML | 4 | 440 | 335 | 59 | 46 |
| Shell | 3 | 434 | 321 | 50 | 63 |
| Makefile | 1 | 170 | 135 | 3 | 32 |
| Dockerfile | 3 | 152 | 59 | 50 | 43 |
| INI | 2 | 50 | 41 | 5 | 4 |
| SVG | 1 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| CSS | 1 | 24 | 16 | 4 | 4 |

Top language (Python 79.2%). Generated at 2026-10-22T06:27:39.869743669+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails/commit/e18c059af3d0f896e8e697f3cc6a5b9ac4b96434?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=7c4f8e94fff48f6f16931581e626e6971af3f16ed7c8248b55820426aa4b6096).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails have?

NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails has 124,047 total lines, including 87,036 code lines, 19,105 comment lines, and 17,906 blank lines.

### How was the NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit e18c059af3d0, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails?

This OctoCounts report was generated from develop at commit e18c059af3d0 on 2026-10-22T06:27:39.869743669+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [agentscope-ai/ReMe](https://octocounts.com/github/agentscope-ai/ReMe) — Python, 87,284 code lines
- [ultralytics/ultralytics](https://octocounts.com/github/ultralytics/ultralytics) — Python, 86,601 code lines
- [kurigram-org/kurigram](https://octocounts.com/github/kurigram-org/kurigram) — Python, 86,152 code lines
- [e2b-dev/E2B](https://octocounts.com/github/e2b-dev/E2B) — Python, 85,743 code lines
- [TNT-Likely/PanWatch](https://octocounts.com/github/TNT-Likely/PanWatch) — Python, 88,451 code lines
- [calesthio/OpenMontage](https://octocounts.com/github/calesthio/OpenMontage) — Python, 85,386 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)