# NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-11 (commit c597bfd5ee77), NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard contains 105,952 total lines: 87,069 code, 7,567 comments, 11,316 blank, across 391 files in 9 languages (top: Python 47.4%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard has 87,069 source lines of code out of 105,952 total lines across 391 files, counted from the c597bfd5ee775e94a579dcc6472910416d961b66 ref at commit c597bfd5ee77 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-11. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard to commit c597bfd5ee77, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 82.2% of all lines, comments represent 7.1%, and the repository averages 223 code lines per file. Python accounts for 47.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 158 | 49,482 | 41,254 | 2,196 | 6,032 |
| Rust | 133 | 41,959 | 36,909 | 1,369 | 3,681 |
| JSON | 5 | 5,135 | 5,135 | 0 | 0 |
| Shell | 14 | 3,491 | 2,550 | 637 | 304 |
| TOML | 28 | 1,215 | 911 | 163 | 141 |
| YAML | 7 | 282 | 223 | 41 | 18 |
| Dockerfile | 5 | 136 | 87 | 15 | 34 |
| Markdown | 36 | 4,186 | 0 | 3,088 | 1,098 |
| Plain Text | 5 | 66 | 0 | 58 | 8 |

Top language (Python 47.4%). Generated at 2026-09-11T15:25:04.291279595+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard/commit/c597bfd5ee775e94a579dcc6472910416d961b66?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard have?

NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard has 105,952 total lines, including 87,069 code lines, 7,567 comment lines, and 11,316 blank lines.

### How was the NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit c597bfd5ee77, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for NVIDIA-NeMo/Switchyard?

This OctoCounts report was generated from c597bfd5ee775e94a579dcc6472910416d961b66 at commit c597bfd5ee77 on 2026-09-11T15:25:04.291279595+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [SakuraMathcraft/LaTeXSnipper](https://octocounts.com/github/SakuraMathcraft/LaTeXSnipper) — Python, 86,516 code lines
- [Hurricane0698/novelwriter](https://octocounts.com/github/Hurricane0698/novelwriter) — Python, 87,940 code lines
- [amarh/openPLM](https://octocounts.com/github/amarh/openPLM) — Python, 89,241 code lines
- [AsahiLinux/m1n1](https://octocounts.com/github/AsahiLinux/m1n1) — Python, 83,683 code lines
- [celery/celery](https://octocounts.com/github/celery/celery) — Python, 90,762 code lines
- [Tencent/AngelSlim](https://octocounts.com/github/Tencent/AngelSlim) — Python, 92,454 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)