# OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-17 (commit 61bc29cd4120), OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize contains 6,704 total lines: 5,343 code, 605 comments, 756 blank, across 33 files in 8 languages (top: Python 57.1%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize has 5,343 source lines of code out of 6,704 total lines across 33 files, counted from the 61bc29cd4120be7b5d3b761b64cd5dff57263642 ref at commit 61bc29cd4120 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize to commit 61bc29cd4120, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 79.7% of all lines, comments represent 9.0%, and the repository averages 162 code lines per file. Python accounts for 57.1% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 20 | 3,503 | 3,053 | 6 | 444 |
| JavaScript | 2 | 1,226 | 1,130 | 0 | 96 |
| CSS | 1 | 637 | 637 | 0 | 0 |
| JSON | 2 | 190 | 190 | 0 | 0 |
| HTML | 1 | 181 | 181 | 0 | 0 |
| SVG | 2 | 120 | 113 | 0 | 7 |
| TOML | 1 | 44 | 39 | 0 | 5 |
| Markdown | 4 | 803 | 0 | 599 | 204 |

Top language (Python 57.1%). Generated at 2026-09-17T01:48:22.705146295+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize/commit/61bc29cd4120be7b5d3b761b64cd5dff57263642?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize have?

OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize has 6,704 total lines, including 5,343 code lines, 605 comment lines, and 756 blank lines.

### How was the OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 61bc29cd4120, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 61bc29cd4120be7b5d3b761b64cd5dff57263642 at commit 61bc29cd4120 on 2026-09-17T01:48:22.705146295+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [JoshuaC215/agent-service-toolkit](https://octocounts.com/github/JoshuaC215/agent-service-toolkit) — Python, 5,351 code lines
- [psf/requests](https://octocounts.com/github/psf/requests) — Python, 5,288 code lines
- [yunwp/TV](https://octocounts.com/github/yunwp/TV) — Python, 5,280 code lines
- [Jasonleonardvolk/sigma-guard](https://octocounts.com/github/Jasonleonardvolk/sigma-guard) — Python, 5,261 code lines
- [mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels](https://octocounts.com/github/mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels) — Python, 5,260 code lines
- [asottile/pyupgrade](https://octocounts.com/github/asottile/pyupgrade) — Python, 5,229 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)