# P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-16 (commit 6ef576caae4e), P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab contains 176,652 total lines: 130,996 code, 25,279 comments, 20,377 blank, across 224 files in 18 languages (top: C++ 54.7%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab has 130,996 source lines of code out of 176,652 total lines across 224 files, counted from the 6ef576caae4e4aa2df62778a192469da10385e68 ref at commit 6ef576caae4e by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-16. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab to commit 6ef576caae4e, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 74.2% of all lines, comments represent 14.3%, and the repository averages 585 code lines per file. C++ accounts for 54.7% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| C++ | 59 | 93,990 | 71,607 | 11,949 | 10,434 |
| C Header | 54 | 62,578 | 44,670 | 10,811 | 7,097 |
| C | 2 | 7,905 | 6,979 | 398 | 528 |
| Python | 35 | 2,877 | 2,242 | 129 | 506 |
| INI | 2 | 2,270 | 1,724 | 0 | 546 |
| Objective-C++ | 2 | 1,915 | 1,436 | 215 | 264 |
| C++ Header | 27 | 1,963 | 1,426 | 142 | 395 |
| D | 1 | 529 | 529 | 0 | 0 |
| CMake | 11 | 370 | 287 | 12 | 71 |
| GLSL | 4 | 78 | 65 | 0 | 13 |
| JSON | 5 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Shell | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 |

Top language (C++ 54.7%). Generated at 2026-09-16T16:48:46.536735251+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab/commit/6ef576caae4e4aa2df62778a192469da10385e68?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab have?

P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab has 176,652 total lines, including 130,996 code lines, 25,279 comment lines, and 20,377 blank lines.

### How was the P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 6ef576caae4e, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for P-E-A-R-L/PearlLab?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 6ef576caae4e4aa2df62778a192469da10385e68 at commit 6ef576caae4e on 2026-09-16T16:48:46.536735251+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [geo-tp/ESP32-Bit-Pirate](https://octocounts.com/github/geo-tp/ESP32-Bit-Pirate) — C++, 140,147 code lines
- [ml-explore/mlx](https://octocounts.com/github/ml-explore/mlx) — C++, 140,897 code lines
- [hyprwm/Hyprland](https://octocounts.com/github/hyprwm/Hyprland) — C++, 120,251 code lines
- [argotorg/solidity](https://octocounts.com/github/argotorg/solidity) — C++, 120,194 code lines
- [ElyPrismLauncher/Launcher](https://octocounts.com/github/ElyPrismLauncher/Launcher) — C++, 142,332 code lines
- [hyprwm/hyprland](https://octocounts.com/github/hyprwm/hyprland) — C++, 118,806 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Electron vs Tauri](https://octocounts.com/compare/electron-vs-tauri)
- [Godot vs Bevy](https://octocounts.com/compare/godot-vs-bevy)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)
