# PacificBiosciences/FALCON SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-29 (commit ab80e88e1278), PacificBiosciences/FALCON contains 16,103 total lines: 12,775 code, 1,058 comments, 2,270 blank, across 106 files in 11 languages (top: Python 87.3%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

PacificBiosciences/FALCON has 12,775 source lines of code out of 16,103 total lines across 106 files, counted from the master ref at commit ab80e88e1278 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-29. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving PacificBiosciences/FALCON to commit ab80e88e1278, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 79.3% of all lines, comments represent 6.6%, and the repository averages 121 code lines per file. Python accounts for 87.3% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 82 | 13,683 | 11,157 | 588 | 1,938 |
| C | 4 | 1,779 | 1,248 | 335 | 196 |
| Forge Config | 6 | 180 | 103 | 27 | 50 |
| Shell | 6 | 136 | 97 | 16 | 23 |
| C Header | 1 | 178 | 90 | 54 | 34 |
| Makefile | 2 | 69 | 44 | 8 | 17 |
| JSON | 1 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| Autoconf | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jupyter Notebooks | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1 | 37 | 0 | 25 | 12 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |

Top language (Python 87.3%). Generated at 2026-09-29T10:17:35.015587223+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/PacificBiosciences/FALCON

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/commit/ab80e88e1278879f28fe83b9fa0382249213444e?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=eee8137ea640aa147996380dcbeb16382237680c3d34f71da898f4b62463d00b).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does PacificBiosciences/FALCON have?

PacificBiosciences/FALCON has 16,103 total lines, including 12,775 code lines, 1,058 comment lines, and 2,270 blank lines.

### How was the PacificBiosciences/FALCON line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit ab80e88e1278, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for PacificBiosciences/FALCON?

This OctoCounts report was generated from master at commit ab80e88e1278 on 2026-09-29T10:17:35.015587223+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [Agents365-ai/drawio-skill](https://octocounts.com/github/Agents365-ai/drawio-skill) — Python, 12,698 code lines
- [k2-fsa/OmniVoice](https://octocounts.com/github/k2-fsa/OmniVoice) — Python, 12,651 code lines
- [zhongerxin/iPhone-use](https://octocounts.com/github/zhongerxin/iPhone-use) — Python, 12,581 code lines
- [debuggyo/Exo](https://octocounts.com/github/debuggyo/Exo) — Python, 12,565 code lines
- [ychowdhrey/skills](https://octocounts.com/github/ychowdhrey/skills) — Python, 13,024 code lines
- [spotDL/spotify-downloader](https://octocounts.com/github/spotDL/spotify-downloader) — Python, 12,526 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)