# Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-29 (commit 7e2e14a6dd73), Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture contains 95,168 total lines: 84,144 code, 2,067 comments, 8,957 blank, across 438 files in 10 languages (top: Python 59.8%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture has 84,144 source lines of code out of 95,168 total lines across 438 files, counted from the 7e2e14a6dd731c4c95e09c3fdb515fec62377702 ref at commit 7e2e14a6dd73 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-29. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture to commit 7e2e14a6dd73, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 88.4% of all lines, comments represent 2.2%, and the repository averages 192 code lines per file. Python accounts for 59.8% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 332 | 58,911 | 50,330 | 1,433 | 7,148 |
| TSX | 75 | 22,284 | 20,455 | 273 | 1,556 |
| JSON | 4 | 10,600 | 10,600 | 0 | 0 |
| TypeScript | 16 | 2,797 | 2,644 | 50 | 103 |
| YAML | 1 | 41 | 39 | 0 | 2 |
| CSS | 1 | 37 | 34 | 0 | 3 |
| TOML | 1 | 33 | 27 | 1 | 5 |
| JavaScript | 2 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| INI | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 5 | 448 | 0 | 310 | 138 |

Top language (Python 59.8%). Generated at 2026-09-29T19:21:16.643265593+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture/commit/7e2e14a6dd731c4c95e09c3fdb515fec62377702?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=8ee6e54ef7855c9b648d031a7b0948a458ca98806a92e93664e5b7fd7fb76d96).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture have?

Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture has 95,168 total lines, including 84,144 code lines, 2,067 comment lines, and 8,957 blank lines.

### How was the Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 7e2e14a6dd73, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for Puriatc10/digital-commodity-infrastracture?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 7e2e14a6dd731c4c95e09c3fdb515fec62377702 at commit 7e2e14a6dd73 on 2026-09-29T19:21:16.643265593+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [deepset-ai/haystack](https://octocounts.com/github/deepset-ai/haystack) — Python, 83,639 code lines
- [codex-radar/dradar](https://octocounts.com/github/codex-radar/dradar) — Python, 84,822 code lines
- [SakuraMathcraft/LaTeXSnipper](https://octocounts.com/github/SakuraMathcraft/LaTeXSnipper) — Python, 83,320 code lines
- [Erenest/-](https://octocounts.com/github/Erenest/-) — Python, 83,184 code lines
- [calesthio/OpenMontage](https://octocounts.com/github/calesthio/OpenMontage) — Python, 85,386 code lines
- [microsoft/UFO](https://octocounts.com/github/microsoft/UFO) — Python, 82,828 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)