# QJHWC/PaperForge SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-11 (commit fb4195914c49), QJHWC/PaperForge contains 76,951 total lines: 63,438 code, 5,307 comments, 8,206 blank, across 229 files in 13 languages (top: Python 78.4%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

QJHWC/PaperForge has 63,438 source lines of code out of 76,951 total lines across 229 files, counted from the main ref at commit fb4195914c49 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-11. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving QJHWC/PaperForge to commit fb4195914c49, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 82.4% of all lines, comments represent 6.9%, and the repository averages 277 code lines per file. Python accounts for 78.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 142 | 55,118 | 49,715 | 363 | 5,040 |
| VB6/VBA | 2 | 11,426 | 10,169 | 0 | 1,257 |
| TeX | 6 | 2,327 | 1,650 | 534 | 143 |
| JavaScript | 1 | 906 | 902 | 0 | 4 |
| JSON | 27 | 333 | 333 | 0 | 0 |
| Shell | 2 | 293 | 251 | 17 | 25 |
| PowerShell | 1 | 159 | 146 | 0 | 13 |
| TOML | 1 | 128 | 117 | 0 | 11 |
| YAML | 8 | 132 | 111 | 11 | 10 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 31 | 23 | 0 | 8 |
| HTML | 1 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 28 | 3,152 | 0 | 2,426 | 726 |

Top language (Python 78.4%). Generated at 2026-10-11T05:36:08.484456424+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/QJHWC/PaperForge

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/QJHWC/PaperForge/commit/fb4195914c4988678eccc0b8be60bc7a458c78d7?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=57a2fb4808ab8b328128bf467ff29ec9a478645452d1452d39220daaeb7987c8).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does QJHWC/PaperForge have?

QJHWC/PaperForge has 76,951 total lines, including 63,438 code lines, 5,307 comment lines, and 8,206 blank lines.

### How was the QJHWC/PaperForge line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit fb4195914c49, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for QJHWC/PaperForge?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit fb4195914c49 on 2026-10-11T05:36:08.484456424+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [OpenMinis/MinisSkills](https://octocounts.com/github/OpenMinis/MinisSkills) — Python, 63,519 code lines
- [jofizcd/Soul-of-Waifu](https://octocounts.com/github/jofizcd/Soul-of-Waifu) — Python, 63,047 code lines
- [KohakuBlueleaf/KohakuMossTrainer](https://octocounts.com/github/KohakuBlueleaf/KohakuMossTrainer) — Python, 64,426 code lines
- [exo-explore/exo](https://octocounts.com/github/exo-explore/exo) — Python, 64,442 code lines
- [mvanhorn/last30days-skill](https://octocounts.com/github/mvanhorn/last30days-skill) — Python, 62,286 code lines
- [usestrix/strix](https://octocounts.com/github/usestrix/strix) — Python, 64,666 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)