# SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-08 (commit 0b8e0bd8839d), SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit contains 61,520 total lines: 43,219 code, 11,199 comments, 7,102 blank, across 138 files in 6 languages (top: Python 95.4%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit to commit 0b8e0bd8839d, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 70.3% of all lines, comments represent 18.2%, and the repository averages 313 code lines per file. Python accounts for 95.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 90 | 48,889 | 41,234 | 2,512 | 5,143 |
| CSS | 3 | 1,267 | 1,020 | 96 | 151 |
| JSON | 21 | 799 | 799 | 0 | 0 |
| RPM Specfile | 1 | 211 | 166 | 28 | 17 |
| Markdown | 22 | 10,333 | 0 | 8,543 | 1,790 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 21 | 0 | 20 | 1 |

Top language (Python 95.4%). Generated at 2026-09-08T16:22:20.456506738+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit have?

SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit has 61,520 total lines, including 43,219 code lines, 11,199 comment lines, and 7,102 blank lines.

### How was the SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 0b8e0bd8839d, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for SamuelBabbertResearch/childrens-media-analysis-toolkit?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 0b8e0bd8839d3637994fdef1ea9a50823c536aca at commit 0b8e0bd8839d on 2026-09-08T16:22:20.456506738+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [cathrynlavery/diagram-design](https://octocounts.com/github/cathrynlavery/diagram-design) — Python, 43,580 code lines
- [kaloscope/kaloscope](https://octocounts.com/github/kaloscope/kaloscope) — Python, 42,673 code lines
- [OpenSourceAP/CrossSection](https://octocounts.com/github/OpenSourceAP/CrossSection) — Python, 44,221 code lines
- [doronz88/pymobiledevice3](https://octocounts.com/github/doronz88/pymobiledevice3) — Python, 42,084 code lines
- [AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo](https://octocounts.com/github/AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo) — Python, 44,355 code lines
- [prompt-toolkit/python-prompt-toolkit](https://octocounts.com/github/prompt-toolkit/python-prompt-toolkit) — Python, 44,517 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)