# TNT-Likely/PanWatch SLOC report

> TNT-Likely/PanWatch: 88,310 code lines at commit d19025a3955c, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-14. Saved result afb92f75df3622075a85e720066709d4a178640ee20279c36a589ac29aa1355b.

TNT-Likely/PanWatch has 88,310 source lines of code out of 103,218 total lines across 474 files, counted from the main ref at commit d19025a3955c by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-14. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, reproduction requires the same commit, engine version, and effective counting rules. Unknown rules in older reports prevent exact reproduction.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving TNT-Likely/PanWatch to commit d19025a3955c, downloading the repository source archive, and counting files selected by the effective rules with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, exact reproduction requires the same commit, engine version, and effective counting rules. Older reports with unknown rules cannot promise exact reproduction.

## Counting rules and retention

TNT-Likely/PanWatch: tokei-14.0.0, policy directories-v1; docs excluded, tests excluded, generated excluded. Excluded directory names: .cache, .generated, .git, .next, __tests__, build, dist, doc, docs, documentation, fixtures, gen, generated, node_modules, target, test, tests, vendor. Ignored languages: none. Repository declarations: off. Exclusions are rule-based; they do not prove that every test, document or generated file was removed.

Saved reports remain subject to cache cleanup and replacement. Export the JSON or text for durable citation; live repository URLs can change.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 85.6% of all lines, comments represent 3.9%, and the repository averages 186 code lines per file. Python accounts for 60.0% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 252 | 61,613 | 52,946 | 1,402 | 7,265 |
| TSX | 91 | 25,068 | 23,331 | 379 | 1,358 |
| TypeScript | 76 | 7,693 | 6,990 | 188 | 515 |
| YAML | 2 | 4,440 | 3,572 | 0 | 868 |
| JavaScript | 7 | 781 | 695 | 21 | 65 |
| JSON | 7 | 171 | 171 | 0 | 0 |
| CSS | 1 | 154 | 138 | 2 | 14 |
| Shell | 3 | 162 | 123 | 12 | 27 |
| Makefile | 1 | 109 | 84 | 11 | 14 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 126 | 63 | 36 | 27 |
| TOML | 5 | 79 | 62 | 5 | 12 |
| SVG | 2 | 53 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
| PowerShell | 1 | 62 | 52 | 0 | 10 |
| HTML | 1 | 30 | 24 | 3 | 3 |
| BASH | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| Markdown | 17 | 2,299 | 0 | 1,637 | 662 |
| Plain Text | 6 | 371 | 0 | 309 | 62 |

Top language (Python 60.0%). Generated at 2026-10-14T11:49:56.626627948Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/TNT-Likely/PanWatch/commit/d19025a3955c0daae131316664b1712eac7bc857?reportId=afb92f75df3622075a85e720066709d4a178640ee20279c36a589ac29aa1355b&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/TNT-Likely/PanWatch/commit/d19025a3955c0daae131316664b1712eac7bc857?reportId=afb92f75df3622075a85e720066709d4a178640ee20279c36a589ac29aa1355b&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does TNT-Likely/PanWatch have?

TNT-Likely/PanWatch has 103,218 total lines, including 88,310 code lines, 4,006 comment lines, and 10,902 blank lines.

### How was the TNT-Likely/PanWatch line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit d19025a3955c, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for TNT-Likely/PanWatch?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit d19025a3955c on 2026-10-14T11:49:56.626627948Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [e2b-dev/E2B](https://octocounts.com/github/e2b-dev/E2B) — Python, 88,693 code lines
- [PrefectHQ/fastmcp](https://octocounts.com/github/PrefectHQ/fastmcp) — Python, 89,011 code lines
- [scenario-labs/blender-plugin](https://octocounts.com/github/scenario-labs/blender-plugin) — Python, 88,332 code lines
- [AsahiLinux/m1n1](https://octocounts.com/github/AsahiLinux/m1n1) — Python, 89,738 code lines
- [the-momentum/open-wearables](https://octocounts.com/github/the-momentum/open-wearables) — Python, 90,056 code lines
- [calesthio/OpenMontage](https://octocounts.com/github/calesthio/OpenMontage) — Python, 90,825 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)