# TauricResearch/TradingAgents SLOC report

> TauricResearch/TradingAgents: 10,964 code lines at commit e8f5503e9b86, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-17. Saved result 2c00f1385aa863e61974a9d9d8d04795f2d227a0b9a36e187f6851c5257069ca.

TauricResearch/TradingAgents has 10,964 source lines of code out of 14,751 total lines across 102 files, counted from the main ref at commit e8f5503e9b86 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving TauricResearch/TradingAgents to commit e8f5503e9b86, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 74.3% of all lines, comments represent 11.5%, and the repository averages 107 code lines per file. Python accounts for 98.3% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 94 | 13,449 | 10,774 | 887 | 1,788 |
| TOML | 1 | 89 | 70 | 8 | 11 |
| SVG | 1 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0 |
| YAML | 1 | 36 | 33 | 0 | 3 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 30 | 20 | 1 | 9 |
| Markdown | 2 | 1,070 | 0 | 791 | 279 |
| Plain Text | 2 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 1 |

Top language (Python 98.3%). Generated at 2026-10-17T19:41:34.723238863Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/TauricResearch/TradingAgents/commit/e8f5503e9b86d5c2710b0c76b1f686703968c9df?reportId=2c00f1385aa863e61974a9d9d8d04795f2d227a0b9a36e187f6851c5257069ca&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/TauricResearch/TradingAgents/commit/e8f5503e9b86d5c2710b0c76b1f686703968c9df?reportId=2c00f1385aa863e61974a9d9d8d04795f2d227a0b9a36e187f6851c5257069ca&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does TauricResearch/TradingAgents have?

TauricResearch/TradingAgents has 14,751 total lines, including 10,964 code lines, 1,696 comment lines, and 2,091 blank lines.

### How was the TauricResearch/TradingAgents line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit e8f5503e9b86, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for TauricResearch/TradingAgents?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit e8f5503e9b86 on 2026-10-17T19:41:34.723238863Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [rq/rq](https://octocounts.com/github/rq/rq) — Python, 10,939 code lines
- [shashankkumar8/Tracefuse](https://octocounts.com/github/shashankkumar8/Tracefuse) — Python, 11,014 code lines
- [babyinsunshine/Dual-Attention-Residuals](https://octocounts.com/github/babyinsunshine/Dual-Attention-Residuals) — Python, 11,040 code lines
- [QwenLM/Qwen3-VL](https://octocounts.com/github/QwenLM/Qwen3-VL) — Python, 10,881 code lines
- [pycqa/isort](https://octocounts.com/github/pycqa/isort) — Python, 11,079 code lines
- [AnonimNEO/Crowbar-Antivirus](https://octocounts.com/github/AnonimNEO/Crowbar-Antivirus) — Python, 11,100 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)