# Z4nzu/hackingtool SLOC report

> Z4nzu/hackingtool: 11,868 code lines at commit be005ce3d52e, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-15. Saved result cd8831e034239aa1a47562a1f799dab64caab4a93cfd7f50b8b0b73d925a031e.

Z4nzu/hackingtool has 11,868 source lines of code out of 15,093 total lines across 121 files, counted from the master ref at commit be005ce3d52e by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-15. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving Z4nzu/hackingtool to commit be005ce3d52e, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 78.6% of all lines, comments represent 8.1%, and the repository averages 98 code lines per file. Python accounts for 74.1% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 84 | 10,811 | 8,790 | 351 | 1,670 |
| YAML | 25 | 3,244 | 2,988 | 160 | 96 |
| TOML | 1 | 56 | 43 | 5 | 8 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 37 | 20 | 13 | 4 |
| Shell | 1 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 4 |
| Makefile | 1 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 |
| JSON | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| SVG | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 6 | 903 | 0 | 687 | 216 |

Top language (Python 74.1%). Generated at 2026-10-15T14:43:19.033697920Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/Z4nzu/hackingtool/commit/be005ce3d52e8826d24bf0cb8107ee51918de178?reportId=cd8831e034239aa1a47562a1f799dab64caab4a93cfd7f50b8b0b73d925a031e&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/Z4nzu/hackingtool/commit/be005ce3d52e8826d24bf0cb8107ee51918de178?reportId=cd8831e034239aa1a47562a1f799dab64caab4a93cfd7f50b8b0b73d925a031e&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does Z4nzu/hackingtool have?

Z4nzu/hackingtool has 15,093 total lines, including 11,868 code lines, 1,224 comment lines, and 2,001 blank lines.

### How was the Z4nzu/hackingtool line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit be005ce3d52e, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for Z4nzu/hackingtool?

This OctoCounts report was generated from master at commit be005ce3d52e on 2026-10-15T14:43:19.033697920Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [MankyDanky/leetcode-practice](https://octocounts.com/github/MankyDanky/leetcode-practice) — Python, 11,864 code lines
- [Raynan00/clacky](https://octocounts.com/github/Raynan00/clacky) — Python, 11,854 code lines
- [Kangel-Plugins/PluginManager](https://octocounts.com/github/Kangel-Plugins/PluginManager) — Python, 11,808 code lines
- [h-arnold/PythonExerciseGeneratorAndDistributor](https://octocounts.com/github/h-arnold/PythonExerciseGeneratorAndDistributor) — Python, 11,710 code lines
- [linxuan-sys/opencode-skills-chinese](https://octocounts.com/github/linxuan-sys/opencode-skills-chinese) — Python, 11,661 code lines
- [JimiStudio/JimiCAS](https://octocounts.com/github/JimiStudio/JimiCAS) — Python, 12,127 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)