# ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-07 (commit 089d9d26d68f), ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis contains 286,799 total lines: 255,502 code, 6,827 comments, 24,470 blank, across 610 files in 17 languages (top: Python 61.9%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis has 255,502 source lines of code out of 286,799 total lines across 610 files, counted from the 089d9d26d68f8b839ea5a74a3784e4402925f8b7 ref at commit 089d9d26d68f by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-07. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis to commit 089d9d26d68f, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 89.1% of all lines, comments represent 2.4%, and the repository averages 419 code lines per file. Python accounts for 61.9% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 343 | 182,864 | 158,266 | 4,951 | 19,647 |
| JSON | 9 | 43,697 | 43,693 | 0 | 4 |
| TSX | 103 | 31,029 | 28,655 | 304 | 2,070 |
| TypeScript | 93 | 19,216 | 16,975 | 710 | 1,531 |
| CSS | 2 | 2,928 | 2,468 | 85 | 375 |
| JavaScript | 5 | 2,433 | 2,276 | 2 | 155 |
| YAML | 26 | 1,647 | 1,375 | 106 | 166 |
| Shell | 7 | 1,070 | 849 | 66 | 155 |
| PowerShell | 5 | 511 | 438 | 0 | 73 |
| Jinja2 | 4 | 403 | 341 | 1 | 61 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 105 | 56 | 27 | 22 |
| Forge Config | 1 | 49 | 43 | 4 | 2 |

Top language (Python 61.9%). Generated at 2026-09-07T03:20:00.452749259+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis/commit/089d9d26d68f8b839ea5a74a3784e4402925f8b7?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis have?

ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis has 286,799 total lines, including 255,502 code lines, 6,827 comment lines, and 24,470 blank lines.

### How was the ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 089d9d26d68f, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 089d9d26d68f8b839ea5a74a3784e4402925f8b7 at commit 089d9d26d68f on 2026-09-07T03:20:00.452749259+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [experientiallabs/experiential](https://octocounts.com/github/experientiallabs/experiential) — Python, 255,796 code lines
- [matplotlib/matplotlib](https://octocounts.com/github/matplotlib/matplotlib) — Python, 256,762 code lines
- [bytedance/deer-flow](https://octocounts.com/github/bytedance/deer-flow) — Python, 260,633 code lines
- [openai/openai-python](https://octocounts.com/github/openai/openai-python) — Python, 263,522 code lines
- [topoteretes/cognee](https://octocounts.com/github/topoteretes/cognee) — Python, 244,313 code lines
- [langchain-ai/deepagents](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/deepagents) — Python, 244,099 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)