# anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-17 (commit d3bea6b5793b), anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness contains 12,038 total lines: 8,313 code, 2,255 comments, 1,470 blank, across 85 files in 10 languages (top: Python 85.5%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness has 8,313 source lines of code out of 12,038 total lines across 85 files, counted from the d3bea6b5793b5f3d59a75ebe69a58efa88383145 ref at commit d3bea6b5793b by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness to commit d3bea6b5793b, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 69.1% of all lines, comments represent 18.7%, and the repository averages 98 code lines per file. Python accounts for 85.5% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 40 | 8,478 | 7,105 | 503 | 870 |
| JSON | 7 | 536 | 536 | 0 | 0 |
| YAML | 6 | 245 | 213 | 24 | 8 |
| Shell | 1 | 233 | 168 | 51 | 14 |
| C | 4 | 234 | 156 | 48 | 30 |
| Dockerfile | 4 | 120 | 81 | 16 | 23 |
| BASH | 1 | 54 | 33 | 14 | 7 |
| TOML | 1 | 25 | 21 | 0 | 4 |
| Markdown | 20 | 2,111 | 0 | 1,597 | 514 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |

Top language (Python 85.5%). Generated at 2026-09-17T02:46:58.467793342+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness/commit/d3bea6b5793b5f3d59a75ebe69a58efa88383145?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness have?

anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness has 12,038 total lines, including 8,313 code lines, 2,255 comment lines, and 1,470 blank lines.

### How was the anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit d3bea6b5793b, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness?

This OctoCounts report was generated from d3bea6b5793b5f3d59a75ebe69a58efa88383145 at commit d3bea6b5793b on 2026-09-17T02:46:58.467793342+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [arnegiacomo/fugleramme](https://octocounts.com/github/arnegiacomo/fugleramme) — Python, 8,278 code lines
- [TheDevilWillBeBee/NPA](https://octocounts.com/github/TheDevilWillBeBee/NPA) — Python, 8,272 code lines
- [multimodal-art-projection/YuE](https://octocounts.com/github/multimodal-art-projection/YuE) — Python, 8,401 code lines
- [TauricResearch/TradingAgents](https://octocounts.com/github/TauricResearch/TradingAgents) — Python, 8,225 code lines
- [pytest-dev/pytest-xdist](https://octocounts.com/github/pytest-dev/pytest-xdist) — Python, 8,173 code lines
- [anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins](https://octocounts.com/github/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins) — Python, 8,457 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)