# browser-use/browser-harness SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-17 (commit afbcc381b963), browser-use/browser-harness contains 23,370 total lines: 5,903 code, 11,225 comments, 6,242 blank, across 153 files in 5 languages (top: Python 98.5%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

browser-use/browser-harness has 5,903 source lines of code out of 23,370 total lines across 153 files, counted from the afbcc381b963040c19627d788e40c7e7663171ee ref at commit afbcc381b963 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving browser-use/browser-harness to commit afbcc381b963, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 25.3% of all lines, comments represent 48.0%, and the repository averages 39 code lines per file. Python accounts for 98.5% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 18 | 6,970 | 5,814 | 299 | 857 |
| TOML | 1 | 54 | 46 | 0 | 8 |
| BASH | 1 | 34 | 27 | 1 | 6 |
| HTML | 1 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
| Markdown | 132 | 16,291 | 0 | 10,920 | 5,371 |

Top language (Python 98.5%). Generated at 2026-09-17T02:27:57.867383001+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/browser-use/browser-harness

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/browser-use/browser-harness/commit/afbcc381b963040c19627d788e40c7e7663171ee?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does browser-use/browser-harness have?

browser-use/browser-harness has 23,370 total lines, including 5,903 code lines, 11,225 comment lines, and 6,242 blank lines.

### How was the browser-use/browser-harness line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit afbcc381b963, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for browser-use/browser-harness?

This OctoCounts report was generated from afbcc381b963040c19627d788e40c7e7663171ee at commit afbcc381b963 on 2026-09-17T02:27:57.867383001+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [CalciumKing/SLAC-LCLS-Stock-Management](https://octocounts.com/github/CalciumKing/SLAC-LCLS-Stock-Management) — Python, 5,878 code lines
- [langchain-ai/open_deep_research](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/open_deep_research) — Python, 5,856 code lines
- [yoheinakajima/babyagi_archive](https://octocounts.com/github/yoheinakajima/babyagi_archive) — Python, 6,062 code lines
- [isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines](https://octocounts.com/github/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines) — Python, 5,737 code lines
- [swe-agent/mini-swe-agent](https://octocounts.com/github/swe-agent/mini-swe-agent) — Python, 6,110 code lines
- [cactus-compute/needle](https://octocounts.com/github/cactus-compute/needle) — Python, 6,111 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)