# cactus-compute/needle SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-06 (commit b5e29432116a), cactus-compute/needle contains 6,749 total lines: 5,413 code, 283 comments, 1,053 blank, across 37 files in 11 languages (top: Python 81.8%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

cactus-compute/needle has 5,413 source lines of code out of 6,749 total lines across 37 files, counted from the b5e29432116af7d91704b50fc2fce79650049355 ref at commit b5e29432116a by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-06. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving cactus-compute/needle to commit b5e29432116a, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 80.2% of all lines, comments represent 4.2%, and the repository averages 146 code lines per file. Python accounts for 81.8% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 25 | 5,262 | 4,430 | 14 | 818 |
| CSS | 1 | 513 | 441 | 0 | 72 |
| JavaScript | 1 | 331 | 298 | 0 | 33 |
| HTML | 1 | 111 | 109 | 0 | 2 |
| SVG | 1 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| TOML | 1 | 45 | 39 | 0 | 6 |
| BASH | 1 | 41 | 32 | 2 | 7 |
| Batch | 1 | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 |
| Autoconf | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1 | 146 | 0 | 93 | 53 |
| Plain Text | 3 | 231 | 0 | 174 | 57 |

Top language (Python 81.8%). Generated at 2026-09-06T17:14:29.447825288+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/cactus-compute/needle

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/cactus-compute/needle/commit/b5e29432116af7d91704b50fc2fce79650049355?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does cactus-compute/needle have?

cactus-compute/needle has 6,749 total lines, including 5,413 code lines, 283 comment lines, and 1,053 blank lines.

### How was the cactus-compute/needle line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit b5e29432116a, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for cactus-compute/needle?

This OctoCounts report was generated from b5e29432116af7d91704b50fc2fce79650049355 at commit b5e29432116a on 2026-09-06T17:14:29.447825288+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [JoshuaC215/agent-service-toolkit](https://octocounts.com/github/JoshuaC215/agent-service-toolkit) — Python, 5,351 code lines
- [OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize](https://octocounts.com/github/OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize) — Python, 5,343 code lines
- [psf/requests](https://octocounts.com/github/psf/requests) — Python, 5,288 code lines
- [yunwp/TV](https://octocounts.com/github/yunwp/TV) — Python, 5,280 code lines
- [Jasonleonardvolk/sigma-guard](https://octocounts.com/github/Jasonleonardvolk/sigma-guard) — Python, 5,261 code lines
- [mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels](https://octocounts.com/github/mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels) — Python, 5,260 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)