# cactus-compute/needle SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-20 (commit fc5bae0f9b61), cactus-compute/needle contains 7,429 total lines: 6,111 code, 263 comments, 1,055 blank, across 41 files in 11 languages (top: Python 75.7%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

cactus-compute/needle has 6,111 source lines of code out of 7,429 total lines across 41 files, counted from the main ref at commit fc5bae0f9b61 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-20. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving cactus-compute/needle to commit fc5bae0f9b61, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 82.3% of all lines, comments represent 3.5%, and the repository averages 149 code lines per file. Python accounts for 75.7% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 25 | 5,487 | 4,626 | 19 | 842 |
| SVG | 5 | 543 | 543 | 0 | 0 |
| CSS | 1 | 513 | 441 | 0 | 72 |
| JavaScript | 1 | 331 | 298 | 0 | 33 |
| HTML | 1 | 111 | 109 | 0 | 2 |
| TOML | 1 | 46 | 40 | 0 | 6 |
| BASH | 1 | 41 | 32 | 2 | 7 |
| Batch | 1 | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 |
| Autoconf | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1 | 92 | 0 | 61 | 31 |
| Plain Text | 3 | 238 | 0 | 181 | 57 |

Top language (Python 75.7%). Generated at 2026-09-20T07:43:58.697893390+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/cactus-compute/needle

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/cactus-compute/needle/commit/fc5bae0f9b6138828fe7589f6b531fb9a26968de?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does cactus-compute/needle have?

cactus-compute/needle has 7,429 total lines, including 6,111 code lines, 263 comment lines, and 1,055 blank lines.

### How was the cactus-compute/needle line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit fc5bae0f9b61, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for cactus-compute/needle?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit fc5bae0f9b61 on 2026-09-20T07:43:58.697893390+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [swe-agent/mini-swe-agent](https://octocounts.com/github/swe-agent/mini-swe-agent) — Python, 6,110 code lines
- [yoheinakajima/babyagi_archive](https://octocounts.com/github/yoheinakajima/babyagi_archive) — Python, 6,062 code lines
- [He-maxed/AI-Job-Search-auto-Apply](https://octocounts.com/github/He-maxed/AI-Job-Search-auto-Apply) — Python, 6,166 code lines
- [browser-use/browser-harness](https://octocounts.com/github/browser-use/browser-harness) — Python, 5,903 code lines
- [microsoft/markitdown](https://octocounts.com/github/microsoft/markitdown) — Python, 6,319 code lines
- [CalciumKing/SLAC-LCLS-Stock-Management](https://octocounts.com/github/CalciumKing/SLAC-LCLS-Stock-Management) — Python, 5,878 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)