# collective/icalendar SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-21 (commit 3ecf079acba0), collective/icalendar contains 29,092 total lines: 25,467 code, 640 comments, 2,985 blank, across 115 files in 11 languages (top: Python 91.0%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

collective/icalendar has 25,467 source lines of code out of 29,092 total lines across 115 files, counted from the main ref at commit 3ecf079acba0 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-21. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving collective/icalendar to commit 3ecf079acba0, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 87.5% of all lines, comments represent 2.2%, and the repository averages 221 code lines per file. Python accounts for 91.0% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 94 | 25,901 | 23,170 | 487 | 2,244 |
| ReStructuredText | 5 | 2,280 | 1,645 | 0 | 635 |
| TOML | 1 | 383 | 304 | 42 | 37 |
| Makefile | 1 | 206 | 153 | 17 | 36 |
| JSON | 1 | 113 | 113 | 0 | 0 |
| BASH | 1 | 76 | 32 | 32 | 12 |
| INI | 1 | 43 | 32 | 7 | 4 |
| Autoconf | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Gherkin (Cucumber) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Shell | 1 | 25 | 6 | 17 | 2 |
| Markdown | 3 | 53 | 0 | 38 | 15 |

Top language (Python 91.0%). Generated at 2026-10-21T02:54:17.895429578+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/collective/icalendar

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/collective/icalendar/commit/3ecf079acba0e592ea6a40c456514984c8657852?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=b4790220ad11a4b72e8b17787f5e25e4ba5b6227538d15fdf2b56c45818edcc1).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does collective/icalendar have?

collective/icalendar has 29,092 total lines, including 25,467 code lines, 640 comment lines, and 2,985 blank lines.

### How was the collective/icalendar line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 3ecf079acba0, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for collective/icalendar?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 3ecf079acba0 on 2026-10-21T02:54:17.895429578+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [yizhiyanhua-ai/fireworks-tech-graph](https://octocounts.com/github/yizhiyanhua-ai/fireworks-tech-graph) — Python, 25,552 code lines
- [ArThirtyFour/exteraPluginsRobot](https://octocounts.com/github/ArThirtyFour/exteraPluginsRobot) — Python, 25,552 code lines
- [JesseTG/libretro.py](https://octocounts.com/github/JesseTG/libretro.py) — Python, 25,591 code lines
- [google-research/timesfm](https://octocounts.com/github/google-research/timesfm) — Python, 25,154 code lines
- [AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian](https://octocounts.com/github/AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian) — Python, 25,142 code lines
- [joshuaswarren/omarchy-apple-dev](https://octocounts.com/github/joshuaswarren/omarchy-apple-dev) — Python, 25,934 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)