# datawhalechina/hello-agents SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-16 (commit 4318ebf3e32d), datawhalechina/hello-agents contains 218,645 total lines: 159,917 code, 28,915 comments, 29,813 blank, across 1,244 files in 21 languages (top: Python 59.1%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

datawhalechina/hello-agents has 159,917 source lines of code out of 218,645 total lines across 1,244 files, counted from the 4318ebf3e32d884cf84ab5395b98b0f819631c6d ref at commit 4318ebf3e32d by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-16. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving datawhalechina/hello-agents to commit 4318ebf3e32d, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 73.1% of all lines, comments represent 13.2%, and the repository averages 129 code lines per file. Python accounts for 59.1% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 737 | 118,721 | 94,521 | 6,357 | 17,843 |
| JSON | 67 | 40,708 | 40,686 | 0 | 22 |
| YAML | 9 | 5,286 | 5,257 | 14 | 15 |
| Jupyter Notebooks | 27 | 7,084 | 4,441 | 1,554 | 1,089 |
| CSS | 14 | 5,202 | 4,389 | 66 | 747 |
| JavaScript | 19 | 3,713 | 3,116 | 171 | 426 |
| Vue | 45 | 2,057 | 1,767 | 95 | 195 |
| TypeScript | 35 | 1,726 | 1,370 | 143 | 213 |
| HTML | 19 | 1,541 | 1,364 | 46 | 131 |
| TSX | 14 | 1,405 | 1,287 | 3 | 115 |
| GDScript | 6 | 897 | 591 | 141 | 165 |
| JSX | 2 | 442 | 391 | 0 | 51 |

Top language (Python 59.1%). Generated at 2026-09-16T04:48:38.852589858+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/datawhalechina/hello-agents

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/datawhalechina/hello-agents/commit/4318ebf3e32d884cf84ab5395b98b0f819631c6d?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does datawhalechina/hello-agents have?

datawhalechina/hello-agents has 218,645 total lines, including 159,917 code lines, 28,915 comment lines, and 29,813 blank lines.

### How was the datawhalechina/hello-agents line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 4318ebf3e32d, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for datawhalechina/hello-agents?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 4318ebf3e32d884cf84ab5395b98b0f819631c6d at commit 4318ebf3e32d on 2026-09-16T04:48:38.852589858+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [meta-pytorch/torchrec](https://octocounts.com/github/meta-pytorch/torchrec) — Python, 158,832 code lines
- [langchain-ai/langgraph](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/langgraph) — Python, 164,040 code lines
- [mem0ai/mem0](https://octocounts.com/github/mem0ai/mem0) — Python, 164,064 code lines
- [langchain-ai/open-swe](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/open-swe) — Python, 154,660 code lines
- [Blaizzy/mlx-audio](https://octocounts.com/github/Blaizzy/mlx-audio) — Python, 154,095 code lines
- [livekit/agents](https://octocounts.com/github/livekit/agents) — Python, 153,977 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)