# e2b-dev/E2B SLOC report

> As of 2026-10-22 (commit f0c19af61d08), e2b-dev/E2B contains 110,783 total lines: 85,743 code, 11,900 comments, 13,140 blank, across 470 files in 13 languages (top: Python 50.9%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

e2b-dev/E2B has 85,743 source lines of code out of 110,783 total lines across 470 files, counted from the main ref at commit f0c19af61d08 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-22. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving e2b-dev/E2B to commit f0c19af61d08, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 77.4% of all lines, comments represent 10.7%, and the repository averages 182 code lines per file. Python accounts for 50.9% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 257 | 52,142 | 43,665 | 797 | 7,680 |
| TypeScript | 136 | 34,466 | 22,725 | 9,122 | 2,619 |
| YAML | 8 | 14,872 | 13,070 | 41 | 1,761 |
| JSON | 18 | 5,470 | 5,470 | 0 | 0 |
| Protocol Buffers | 2 | 326 | 236 | 20 | 70 |
| Handlebars | 6 | 222 | 187 | 0 | 35 |
| TOML | 4 | 206 | 170 | 7 | 29 |
| Makefile | 5 | 132 | 95 | 11 | 26 |
| Dockerfile | 4 | 110 | 63 | 27 | 20 |
| Shell | 2 | 66 | 35 | 22 | 9 |
| INI | 4 | 33 | 25 | 5 | 3 |
| JavaScript | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |

Top language (Python 50.9%). Generated at 2026-10-22T06:03:39.945512923+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/e2b-dev/E2B

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/e2b-dev/E2B/commit/f0c19af61d0845c53f4255cc1ebf79014fb9a883?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D&reportId=defd03112aba52d99d770a96fbc6bc1133f802abb8bb14e8709ca0e48c7bdca2).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does e2b-dev/E2B have?

e2b-dev/E2B has 110,783 total lines, including 85,743 code lines, 11,900 comment lines, and 13,140 blank lines.

### How was the e2b-dev/E2B line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit f0c19af61d08, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for e2b-dev/E2B?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit f0c19af61d08 on 2026-10-22T06:03:39.945512923+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [calesthio/OpenMontage](https://octocounts.com/github/calesthio/OpenMontage) — Python, 85,386 code lines
- [kurigram-org/kurigram](https://octocounts.com/github/kurigram-org/kurigram) — Python, 86,152 code lines
- [ultralytics/ultralytics](https://octocounts.com/github/ultralytics/ultralytics) — Python, 86,601 code lines
- [codex-radar/dradar](https://octocounts.com/github/codex-radar/dradar) — Python, 84,822 code lines
- [NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails](https://octocounts.com/github/NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails) — Python, 87,036 code lines
- [agentscope-ai/ReMe](https://octocounts.com/github/agentscope-ai/ReMe) — Python, 87,284 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)