# elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS SLOC report

> elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS: 122,367 code lines at commit 7fee69687467, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-22. Saved result 7e0f152df1b8efac60a11511572aa67c5099991e8ac3d031c57a79470dda86ec.

elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS has 122,367 source lines of code out of 141,482 total lines across 306 files, counted from the main ref at commit 7fee69687467 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-22. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS to commit 7fee69687467, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 86.5% of all lines, comments represent 4.2%, and the repository averages 400 code lines per file. Python accounts for 93.1% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 254 | 130,587 | 113,976 | 4,323 | 12,288 |
| JSON | 14 | 5,685 | 5,685 | 0 | 0 |
| TeX | 2 | 1,713 | 1,329 | 33 | 351 |
| Shell | 6 | 743 | 607 | 56 | 80 |
| YAML | 11 | 641 | 574 | 31 | 36 |
| TOML | 1 | 195 | 170 | 7 | 18 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 |
| HTML | 1 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Jupyter Notebooks | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 12 | 1,840 | 0 | 1,388 | 452 |
| Plain Text | 3 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0 |

Top language (Python 93.1%). Generated at 2026-10-22T05:39:50.283067487Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS/commit/7fee696874674f617b6c97421ecb94de937f9827?reportId=7e0f152df1b8efac60a11511572aa67c5099991e8ac3d031c57a79470dda86ec&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS/commit/7fee696874674f617b6c97421ecb94de937f9827?reportId=7e0f152df1b8efac60a11511572aa67c5099991e8ac3d031c57a79470dda86ec&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS have?

elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS has 141,482 total lines, including 122,367 code lines, 5,881 comment lines, and 13,234 blank lines.

### How was the elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 7fee69687467, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 7fee69687467 on 2026-10-22T05:39:50.283067487Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [google/artemis](https://octocounts.com/github/google/artemis) — Python, 122,020 code lines
- [linxuhao/AItelier](https://octocounts.com/github/linxuhao/AItelier) — Python, 123,816 code lines
- [TheAlgorithms/Python](https://octocounts.com/github/TheAlgorithms/Python) — Python, 127,292 code lines
- [verl-project/verl](https://octocounts.com/github/verl-project/verl) — Python, 117,606 code lines
- [alibaba/ROLL](https://octocounts.com/github/alibaba/ROLL) — Python, 117,580 code lines
- [ansible/ansible](https://octocounts.com/github/ansible/ansible) — Python, 127,869 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)