femimarket/swiftapi SLOC report

As of 2026-06-27 (commit 412be6549085), femimarket/swiftapi contains 411 total lines: 268 code, 77 comments, 66 blank, across 8 files in 6 languages (top: Swift 44.0%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

As of 2026-06-27 (commit 412be6549085), femimarket/swiftapi contains 411 total lines: 268 code, 77 comments, 66 blank, across 8 files in 6 languages (top: Swift 44.0%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving femimarket/swiftapi to commit 412be6549085, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 65.2% of all lines, comments represent 18.7%, and the repository averages 34 code lines per file. Swift accounts for 44.0% of counted code.

LanguageFilesLinesCodeCommentsBlanks
Swift313211859
Rust1998676
Shell14431310
TOML1201703
C Header1211605
Markdown19506233

Top language (Swift 44.0%). Generated at .

Report FAQ

How many lines of code does femimarket/swiftapi have?

femimarket/swiftapi has 411 total lines, including 268 code lines, 77 comment lines, and 66 blank lines.

How was the femimarket/swiftapi line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 412be6549085, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

What commit was counted for femimarket/swiftapi?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 412be6549085 on 2026-06-27T05:20:33.760962843+00:00.

Similar repository reports

Other public repositories with an OctoCounts report, ranked by top language and code size similarity: