# firecrawl/fire-enrich SLOC report

> firecrawl/fire-enrich: 40,121 code lines at commit 94e061dc5bab, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-18. Saved result 504f60a96d7f690c02b18fa510f1feac2f9fb17b12e6f5bad5510c3d69f0e519.

firecrawl/fire-enrich has 40,121 source lines of code out of 45,210 total lines across 211 files, counted from the 94e061dc5bab94e5838cceb8b3d5e6af329d2d50 ref at commit 94e061dc5bab by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-18. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving firecrawl/fire-enrich to commit 94e061dc5bab, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 88.7% of all lines, comments represent 3.1%, and the repository averages 190 code lines per file. TSX accounts for 31.6% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| TSX | 111 | 14,344 | 12,669 | 306 | 1,369 |
| JSON | 13 | 10,180 | 10,180 | 0 | 0 |
| TypeScript | 61 | 9,437 | 7,717 | 482 | 1,238 |
| YAML | 1 | 8,231 | 7,646 | 0 | 585 |
| CSS | 20 | 2,421 | 1,883 | 184 | 354 |
| JavaScript | 2 | 33 | 26 | 2 | 5 |
| Markdown | 2 | 529 | 0 | 382 | 147 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 35 | 0 | 30 | 5 |

Top language (TSX 31.6%). Generated at 2026-10-18T22:18:54.127198887Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/firecrawl/fire-enrich/commit/94e061dc5bab94e5838cceb8b3d5e6af329d2d50?reportId=504f60a96d7f690c02b18fa510f1feac2f9fb17b12e6f5bad5510c3d69f0e519&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/firecrawl/fire-enrich/commit/94e061dc5bab94e5838cceb8b3d5e6af329d2d50?reportId=504f60a96d7f690c02b18fa510f1feac2f9fb17b12e6f5bad5510c3d69f0e519&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does firecrawl/fire-enrich have?

firecrawl/fire-enrich has 45,210 total lines, including 40,121 code lines, 1,386 comment lines, and 3,703 blank lines.

### How was the firecrawl/fire-enrich line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 94e061dc5bab, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for firecrawl/fire-enrich?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 94e061dc5bab94e5838cceb8b3d5e6af329d2d50 at commit 94e061dc5bab on 2026-10-18T22:18:54.127198887Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [wanghua98/magic-resume](https://octocounts.com/github/wanghua98/magic-resume) — TSX, 40,245 code lines
- [NUber-dev/YTubic](https://octocounts.com/github/NUber-dev/YTubic) — TSX, 40,708 code lines
- [nextai-translator/nextai-translator](https://octocounts.com/github/nextai-translator/nextai-translator) — TSX, 39,043 code lines
- [totalumlabs/ai-app-builder-open](https://octocounts.com/github/totalumlabs/ai-app-builder-open) — TSX, 41,493 code lines
- [MoonTechLab/LunaTV](https://octocounts.com/github/MoonTechLab/LunaTV) — TSX, 37,885 code lines
- [coolcoala/koala-clash](https://octocounts.com/github/coolcoala/koala-clash) — TSX, 43,199 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)
