# foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-17 (commit ddcaa2affca9), foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills contains 501,242 total lines: 193,574 code, 205,260 comments, 102,408 blank, across 2,298 files in 19 languages (top: Python 46.7%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills has 193,574 source lines of code out of 501,242 total lines across 2,298 files, counted from the ddcaa2affca93c1efe026d008b6b93709e5fb7e2 ref at commit ddcaa2affca9 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills to commit ddcaa2affca9, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 38.6% of all lines, comments represent 41.0%, and the repository averages 84 code lines per file. Python accounts for 46.7% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 444 | 110,111 | 90,423 | 4,290 | 15,398 |
| PowerShell | 271 | 65,333 | 58,532 | 165 | 6,636 |
| JSON | 248 | 30,102 | 29,986 | 0 | 116 |
| TeX | 29 | 13,798 | 9,608 | 1,388 | 2,802 |
| Shell | 29 | 3,053 | 2,327 | 260 | 466 |
| JavaScript | 3 | 1,620 | 1,238 | 240 | 142 |
| YAML | 30 | 811 | 557 | 139 | 115 |
| HTML | 4 | 351 | 291 | 31 | 29 |
| Swift | 3 | 188 | 159 | 1 | 28 |
| XML | 12 | 116 | 110 | 1 | 5 |
| SVG | 16 | 87 | 87 | 0 | 0 |
| TypeScript | 1 | 158 | 74 | 70 | 14 |

Top language (Python 46.7%). Generated at 2026-09-17T03:52:55.034174962+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills/commit/ddcaa2affca93c1efe026d008b6b93709e5fb7e2?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills have?

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills has 501,242 total lines, including 193,574 code lines, 205,260 comment lines, and 102,408 blank lines.

### How was the foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit ddcaa2affca9, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills?

This OctoCounts report was generated from ddcaa2affca93c1efe026d008b6b93709e5fb7e2 at commit ddcaa2affca9 on 2026-09-17T03:52:55.034174962+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [AstrBotDevs/AstrBot](https://octocounts.com/github/AstrBotDevs/AstrBot) — Python, 196,166 code lines
- [PrefectHQ/fastmcp](https://octocounts.com/github/PrefectHQ/fastmcp) — Python, 196,705 code lines
- [semantica-agi/semantica](https://octocounts.com/github/semantica-agi/semantica) — Python, 189,849 code lines
- [plastic-labs/honcho](https://octocounts.com/github/plastic-labs/honcho) — Python, 197,322 code lines
- [crewaiinc/crewai](https://octocounts.com/github/crewaiinc/crewai) — Python, 198,571 code lines
- [dograh-hq/dograh](https://octocounts.com/github/dograh-hq/dograh) — Python, 199,995 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)