# google/artemis SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-12 (commit e983180b5bb2), google/artemis contains 138,544 total lines: 113,299 code, 10,383 comments, 14,862 blank, across 442 files in 16 languages (top: Python 64.5%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving google/artemis to commit e983180b5bb2, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 81.8% of all lines, comments represent 7.5%, and the repository averages 256 code lines per file. Python accounts for 64.5% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 324 | 90,808 | 73,059 | 6,807 | 10,942 |
| TypeScript | 40 | 15,715 | 12,672 | 1,577 | 1,466 |
| Sass | 10 | 12,932 | 11,043 | 278 | 1,611 |
| JSON | 15 | 9,894 | 9,893 | 0 | 1 |
| HTML | 11 | 5,031 | 4,413 | 409 | 209 |
| PowerShell | 2 | 1,020 | 867 | 70 | 83 |
| Shell | 3 | 1,029 | 830 | 105 | 94 |
| TOML | 2 | 295 | 221 | 38 | 36 |
| Makefile | 1 | 115 | 79 | 13 | 23 |
| SVG | 2 | 112 | 78 | 18 | 16 |
| Dockerfile | 2 | 126 | 64 | 38 | 24 |
| YAML | 1 | 48 | 30 | 15 | 3 |

Top language (Python 64.5%). Generated at 2026-09-12T18:41:11.504922737+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/google/artemis

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does google/artemis have?

google/artemis has 138,544 total lines, including 113,299 code lines, 10,383 comment lines, and 14,862 blank lines.

### How was the google/artemis line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit e983180b5bb2, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for google/artemis?

This OctoCounts report was generated from e983180b5bb228e6edb482214a70f533048a523f at commit e983180b5bb2 on 2026-09-12T18:41:11.504922737+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [langchain-ai/open-swe](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/open-swe) — Python, 112,804 code lines
- [fla-org/flash-linear-attention](https://octocounts.com/github/fla-org/flash-linear-attention) — Python, 114,257 code lines
- [SanAntonio021/agents-skills](https://octocounts.com/github/SanAntonio021/agents-skills) — Python, 114,897 code lines
- [Tracer-Cloud/opensre](https://octocounts.com/github/Tracer-Cloud/opensre) — Python, 115,417 code lines
- [ManimCommunity/manim](https://octocounts.com/github/ManimCommunity/manim) — Python, 115,517 code lines
- [andrewyng/aisuite](https://octocounts.com/github/andrewyng/aisuite) — Python, 110,096 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)