# handy-computer/transcribe.cpp SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-17 (commit be7a8b35e9ba), handy-computer/transcribe.cpp contains 679,794 total lines: 526,627 code, 60,536 comments, 92,631 blank, across 2,045 files in 27 languages (top: C++ 42.6%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

handy-computer/transcribe.cpp has 526,627 source lines of code out of 679,794 total lines across 2,045 files, counted from the be7a8b35e9ba2df20298bd26e32d53407c3bcbcd ref at commit be7a8b35e9ba by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving handy-computer/transcribe.cpp to commit be7a8b35e9ba, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 77.5% of all lines, comments represent 8.9%, and the repository averages 258 code lines per file. C++ accounts for 42.6% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| C++ | 385 | 286,304 | 224,482 | 23,187 | 38,635 |
| C | 93 | 82,147 | 64,246 | 4,585 | 13,316 |
| C Header | 284 | 74,470 | 47,856 | 16,400 | 10,214 |
| Python | 173 | 59,168 | 47,450 | 4,530 | 7,188 |
| OpenCL | 167 | 39,065 | 33,783 | 0 | 5,282 |
| CUDA | 187 | 24,668 | 19,789 | 1,230 | 3,649 |
| JSON | 139 | 19,382 | 19,382 | 0 | 0 |
| GLSL | 171 | 21,255 | 17,018 | 748 | 3,489 |
| C++ Header | 72 | 18,280 | 14,242 | 1,254 | 2,784 |
| Metal Shading Language | 1 | 11,820 | 9,002 | 409 | 2,409 |
| WebGPU Shader Language | 43 | 6,978 | 5,668 | 215 | 1,095 |
| CMake | 55 | 6,268 | 4,614 | 892 | 762 |

Top language (C++ 42.6%). Generated at 2026-09-17T05:21:12.828917627+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/handy-computer/transcribe.cpp

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/handy-computer/transcribe.cpp/commit/be7a8b35e9ba2df20298bd26e32d53407c3bcbcd?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does handy-computer/transcribe.cpp have?

handy-computer/transcribe.cpp has 679,794 total lines, including 526,627 code lines, 60,536 comment lines, and 92,631 blank lines.

### How was the handy-computer/transcribe.cpp line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit be7a8b35e9ba, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for handy-computer/transcribe.cpp?

This OctoCounts report was generated from be7a8b35e9ba2df20298bd26e32d53407c3bcbcd at commit be7a8b35e9ba on 2026-09-17T05:21:12.828917627+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [LostRuins/koboldcpp](https://octocounts.com/github/LostRuins/koboldcpp) — C++, 529,734 code lines
- [chromium/openscreen](https://octocounts.com/github/chromium/openscreen) — C++, 523,407 code lines
- [RPCS3/rpcs3](https://octocounts.com/github/RPCS3/rpcs3) — C++, 519,239 code lines
- [noctalia-dev/noctalia](https://octocounts.com/github/noctalia-dev/noctalia) — C++, 534,169 code lines
- [pointcloudlibrary/pcl](https://octocounts.com/github/pointcloudlibrary/pcl) — C++, 515,645 code lines
- [tdlib/td](https://octocounts.com/github/tdlib/td) — C++, 542,026 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Electron vs Tauri](https://octocounts.com/compare/electron-vs-tauri)
- [Godot vs Bevy](https://octocounts.com/compare/godot-vs-bevy)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)