# huggingface/text-generation-inference SLOC report

> As of 2026-08-26 (commit b4adbf2f6e2e), huggingface/text-generation-inference contains 177,291 total lines: 150,835 code, 9,908 comments, 16,548 blank, across 708 files in 18 languages (top: Python 56.4%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving huggingface/text-generation-inference to commit b4adbf2f6e2e, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 85.1% of all lines, comments represent 5.6%, and the repository averages 213 code lines per file. Python accounts for 56.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 348 | 103,849 | 85,064 | 5,610 | 13,175 |
| JSON | 205 | 41,892 | 41,892 | 0 | 0 |
| Rust | 64 | 22,606 | 19,242 | 1,130 | 2,234 |
| CUDA | 9 | 1,978 | 1,454 | 222 | 302 |
| TOML | 18 | 734 | 662 | 4 | 68 |
| Nix | 8 | 657 | 548 | 67 | 42 |
| C++ | 3 | 472 | 372 | 19 | 81 |
| C++ Header | 3 | 503 | 327 | 105 | 71 |
| Shell | 7 | 353 | 304 | 17 | 32 |
| Protocol Buffers | 2 | 525 | 299 | 167 | 59 |
| Makefile | 8 | 337 | 235 | 27 | 75 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 250 | 149 | 48 | 53 |

Top language (Python 56.4%). Generated at 2026-08-26T18:19:59.516443495+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/huggingface/text-generation-inference

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does huggingface/text-generation-inference have?

huggingface/text-generation-inference has 177,291 total lines, including 150,835 code lines, 9,908 comment lines, and 16,548 blank lines.

### How was the huggingface/text-generation-inference line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit b4adbf2f6e2e, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for huggingface/text-generation-inference?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit b4adbf2f6e2e on 2026-08-26T18:19:59.516443495+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [plastic-labs/honcho](https://octocounts.com/github/plastic-labs/honcho) — Python, 151,675 code lines
- [Osmantic/ODS](https://octocounts.com/github/Osmantic/ODS) — Python, 152,023 code lines
- [repowise-dev/repowise](https://octocounts.com/github/repowise-dev/repowise) — Python, 153,107 code lines
- [HKUDS/Vibe-Trading](https://octocounts.com/github/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading) — Python, 148,505 code lines
- [dograh-hq/dograh](https://octocounts.com/github/dograh-hq/dograh) — Python, 154,964 code lines
- [livekit/agents](https://octocounts.com/github/livekit/agents) — Python, 143,347 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)