# huggingface/text-generation-inference SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-17 (commit dfb3fbe78e0d), huggingface/text-generation-inference contains 177,291 total lines: 150,835 code, 9,908 comments, 16,548 blank, across 708 files in 18 languages (top: Python 56.4%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

huggingface/text-generation-inference has 150,835 source lines of code out of 177,291 total lines across 708 files, counted from the dfb3fbe78e0d1d69251bd33065591c61bafdfaa8 ref at commit dfb3fbe78e0d by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving huggingface/text-generation-inference to commit dfb3fbe78e0d, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 85.1% of all lines, comments represent 5.6%, and the repository averages 213 code lines per file. Python accounts for 56.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 348 | 103,849 | 85,064 | 5,610 | 13,175 |
| JSON | 205 | 41,892 | 41,892 | 0 | 0 |
| Rust | 64 | 22,606 | 19,242 | 1,130 | 2,234 |
| CUDA | 9 | 1,978 | 1,454 | 222 | 302 |
| TOML | 18 | 734 | 662 | 4 | 68 |
| Nix | 8 | 657 | 548 | 67 | 42 |
| C++ | 3 | 472 | 372 | 19 | 81 |
| C++ Header | 3 | 503 | 327 | 105 | 71 |
| Shell | 7 | 353 | 304 | 17 | 32 |
| Protocol Buffers | 2 | 525 | 299 | 167 | 59 |
| Makefile | 8 | 337 | 235 | 27 | 75 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 250 | 149 | 48 | 53 |

Top language (Python 56.4%). Generated at 2026-09-17T01:18:43.443146197+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/huggingface/text-generation-inference

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/huggingface/text-generation-inference/commit/dfb3fbe78e0d1d69251bd33065591c61bafdfaa8?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does huggingface/text-generation-inference have?

huggingface/text-generation-inference has 177,291 total lines, including 150,835 code lines, 9,908 comment lines, and 16,548 blank lines.

### How was the huggingface/text-generation-inference line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit dfb3fbe78e0d, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for huggingface/text-generation-inference?

This OctoCounts report was generated from dfb3fbe78e0d1d69251bd33065591c61bafdfaa8 at commit dfb3fbe78e0d on 2026-09-17T01:18:43.443146197+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [Osmantic/ODS](https://octocounts.com/github/Osmantic/ODS) — Python, 152,023 code lines
- [gradio-app/gradio](https://octocounts.com/github/gradio-app/gradio) — Python, 149,587 code lines
- [livekit/agents](https://octocounts.com/github/livekit/agents) — Python, 153,977 code lines
- [Blaizzy/mlx-audio](https://octocounts.com/github/Blaizzy/mlx-audio) — Python, 154,095 code lines
- [langchain-ai/open-swe](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/open-swe) — Python, 154,660 code lines
- [openai/openai-agents-python](https://octocounts.com/github/openai/openai-agents-python) — Python, 144,673 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)