# junchen-fu/DIGER SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-12 (commit 56a0dcff9e14), junchen-fu/DIGER contains 7,767 total lines: 5,684 code, 345 comments, 1,738 blank, across 48 files in 6 languages (top: Python 80.5%). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving junchen-fu/DIGER to commit 56a0dcff9e14, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 73.2% of all lines, comments represent 4.4%, and the repository averages 118 code lines per file. Python accounts for 80.5% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 21 | 6,155 | 4,577 | 79 | 1,499 |
| Shell | 15 | 980 | 853 | 22 | 105 |
| YAML | 5 | 286 | 249 | 0 | 37 |
| JSON | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 1 | 332 | 0 | 235 | 97 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 |

Top language (Python 80.5%). Generated at 2026-09-12T12:55:12.078021364+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/junchen-fu/DIGER

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does junchen-fu/DIGER have?

junchen-fu/DIGER has 7,767 total lines, including 5,684 code lines, 345 comment lines, and 1,738 blank lines.

### How was the junchen-fu/DIGER line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 56a0dcff9e14, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for junchen-fu/DIGER?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 56a0dcff9e149b8a781c63b0529242656a64f64b at commit 56a0dcff9e14 on 2026-09-12T12:55:12.078021364+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [QwenLM/Qwen3-ASR](https://octocounts.com/github/QwenLM/Qwen3-ASR) — Python, 5,684 code lines
- [FoxUserbot/CustomModules](https://octocounts.com/github/FoxUserbot/CustomModules) — Python, 5,688 code lines
- [OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize](https://octocounts.com/github/OpenMOSS/MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize) — Python, 5,712 code lines
- [HaoyueQin/mujoco-hide-and-seek](https://octocounts.com/github/HaoyueQin/mujoco-hide-and-seek) — Python, 5,631 code lines
- [alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill](https://octocounts.com/github/alirezarezvani/claude-code-aso-skill) — Python, 5,607 code lines
- [Mavis2103/skill-context-manager](https://octocounts.com/github/Mavis2103/skill-context-manager) — Python, 5,841 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)