# livekit/agents SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-16 (commit 9d395c3bb2b0), livekit/agents contains 194,156 total lines: 153,977 code, 13,238 comments, 26,941 blank, across 1,033 files in 11 languages (top: Python 93.8%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

livekit/agents has 153,977 source lines of code out of 194,156 total lines across 1,033 files, counted from the 9d395c3bb2b031df984edf82705b883f8932892a ref at commit 9d395c3bb2b0 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-16. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving livekit/agents to commit 9d395c3bb2b0, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 79.3% of all lines, comments represent 6.8%, and the repository averages 149 code lines per file. Python accounts for 93.8% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 789 | 178,578 | 144,411 | 9,723 | 24,444 |
| YAML | 5 | 4,582 | 4,360 | 162 | 60 |
| TOML | 89 | 3,994 | 3,425 | 64 | 505 |
| C | 2 | 1,188 | 1,001 | 56 | 131 |
| Makefile | 1 | 327 | 299 | 7 | 21 |
| Dockerfile | 9 | 464 | 252 | 122 | 90 |
| JSON | 2 | 179 | 178 | 0 | 1 |
| CMake | 1 | 55 | 44 | 2 | 9 |
| INI | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 133 | 4,756 | 0 | 3,082 | 1,674 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 26 | 0 | 20 | 6 |

Top language (Python 93.8%). Generated at 2026-09-16T05:44:30.264398832+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/livekit/agents

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/livekit/agents/commit/9d395c3bb2b031df984edf82705b883f8932892a?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does livekit/agents have?

livekit/agents has 194,156 total lines, including 153,977 code lines, 13,238 comment lines, and 26,941 blank lines.

### How was the livekit/agents line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 9d395c3bb2b0, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for livekit/agents?

This OctoCounts report was generated from 9d395c3bb2b031df984edf82705b883f8932892a at commit 9d395c3bb2b0 on 2026-09-16T05:44:30.264398832+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [Blaizzy/mlx-audio](https://octocounts.com/github/Blaizzy/mlx-audio) — Python, 154,095 code lines
- [langchain-ai/open-swe](https://octocounts.com/github/langchain-ai/open-swe) — Python, 154,660 code lines
- [Osmantic/ODS](https://octocounts.com/github/Osmantic/ODS) — Python, 152,023 code lines
- [huggingface/text-generation-inference](https://octocounts.com/github/huggingface/text-generation-inference) — Python, 150,835 code lines
- [meta-pytorch/torchrec](https://octocounts.com/github/meta-pytorch/torchrec) — Python, 158,832 code lines
- [datawhalechina/hello-agents](https://octocounts.com/github/datawhalechina/hello-agents) — Python, 159,917 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)
