# microsoft/quicksand SLOC report

> microsoft/quicksand: 23,493 code lines at commit 5db6adaf04ed, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-17. Saved result 23b5e49508b93e90c44ee729388629a099c80177acff85c5fba2c61797b108c5.

microsoft/quicksand has 23,493 source lines of code out of 30,084 total lines across 160 files, counted from the main ref at commit 5db6adaf04ed by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-17. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving microsoft/quicksand to commit 5db6adaf04ed, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 78.1% of all lines, comments represent 8.3%, and the repository averages 147 code lines per file. Python accounts for 63.8% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 106 | 19,044 | 14,977 | 1,033 | 3,034 |
| JSON | 2 | 3,877 | 3,877 | 0 | 0 |
| Rust | 4 | 3,517 | 3,159 | 99 | 259 |
| YAML | 3 | 598 | 554 | 9 | 35 |
| TOML | 17 | 591 | 479 | 17 | 95 |
| Bicep | 1 | 302 | 266 | 11 | 25 |
| Dockerfile | 3 | 236 | 117 | 76 | 43 |
| Jinja2 | 1 | 70 | 58 | 0 | 12 |
| INI | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 22 | 1,843 | 0 | 1,242 | 601 |

Top language (Python 63.8%). Generated at 2026-10-17T21:22:40.933939327Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/microsoft/quicksand/commit/5db6adaf04ed61a003d7906a898f448ef89e4f3c?reportId=23b5e49508b93e90c44ee729388629a099c80177acff85c5fba2c61797b108c5&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/microsoft/quicksand/commit/5db6adaf04ed61a003d7906a898f448ef89e4f3c?reportId=23b5e49508b93e90c44ee729388629a099c80177acff85c5fba2c61797b108c5&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does microsoft/quicksand have?

microsoft/quicksand has 30,084 total lines, including 23,493 code lines, 2,487 comment lines, and 4,104 blank lines.

### How was the microsoft/quicksand line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 5db6adaf04ed, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for microsoft/quicksand?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 5db6adaf04ed on 2026-10-17T21:22:40.933939327Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [yang0/handraw-style](https://octocounts.com/github/yang0/handraw-style) — Python, 23,429 code lines
- [mojave333/sonicache](https://octocounts.com/github/mojave333/sonicache) — Python, 23,272 code lines
- [yutori-ai/yutori-sdk-python](https://octocounts.com/github/yutori-ai/yutori-sdk-python) — Python, 23,749 code lines
- [3b1b/manim](https://octocounts.com/github/3b1b/manim) — Python, 23,952 code lines
- [makeentropy/JMKstudio-Project-0-pool-0-DataSet-0](https://octocounts.com/github/makeentropy/JMKstudio-Project-0-pool-0-DataSet-0) — Python, 24,021 code lines
- [zxkmm/kicad-harness](https://octocounts.com/github/zxkmm/kicad-harness) — Python, 24,115 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)