# mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-05 (commit d4958f588666), mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps contains 24,625 total lines: 4,374 code, 19,220 comments, 1,031 blank, across 75 files in 5 languages (top: Java 94.8%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps has 4,374 source lines of code out of 24,625 total lines across 75 files, counted from the new-path-edge ref at commit d4958f588666 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-05. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps to commit d4958f588666, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 17.8% of all lines, comments represent 78.1%, and the repository averages 58 code lines per file. Java accounts for 94.8% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Java | 64 | 5,859 | 4,146 | 743 | 970 |
| XML | 1 | 125 | 119 | 1 | 5 |
| JavaScript | 7 | 130 | 109 | 10 | 11 |
| Markdown | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Plain Text | 2 | 18,510 | 0 | 18,465 | 45 |

Top language (Java 94.8%). Generated at 2026-09-05T12:15:04.658308148+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps/commit/d4958f5886666a0b32ea1b7e88d18965824b715b?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps have?

mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps has 24,625 total lines, including 4,374 code lines, 19,220 comment lines, and 1,031 blank lines.

### How was the mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit d4958f588666, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for mig40000/Demand-driven-IFC-for-Hybrid-apps?

This OctoCounts report was generated from new-path-edge at commit d4958f588666 on 2026-09-05T12:15:04.658308148+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [nageoffer/tinyrag](https://octocounts.com/github/nageoffer/tinyrag) — Java, 4,759 code lines
- [MatveiSlizkii/Receipt-Application](https://octocounts.com/github/MatveiSlizkii/Receipt-Application) — Java, 3,849 code lines
- [count-negative/qwickie](https://octocounts.com/github/count-negative/qwickie) — Java, 3,746 code lines
- [amankumar-aj/XenoZapCRMBackend](https://octocounts.com/github/amankumar-aj/XenoZapCRMBackend) — Java, 5,189 code lines
- [ClaudioRizzo/BabelView](https://octocounts.com/github/ClaudioRizzo/BabelView) — Java, 5,223 code lines
- [yuanchun-li/HybridFlow](https://octocounts.com/github/yuanchun-li/HybridFlow) — Java, 3,443 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [MongoDB vs PostgreSQL](https://octocounts.com/compare/mongodb-vs-postgres)
- [Kubernetes vs Docker Compose](https://octocounts.com/compare/kubernetes-vs-docker-compose)
- [Kubernetes vs Terraform](https://octocounts.com/compare/kubernetes-vs-terraform)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)