# semantica-agi/semantica SLOC report

> As of 2026-09-06 (commit dabeb0e833b6), semantica-agi/semantica contains 237,880 total lines: 189,849 code, 18,682 comments, 29,349 blank, across 594 files in 16 languages (top: Python 79.7%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

semantica-agi/semantica has 189,849 source lines of code out of 237,880 total lines across 594 files, counted from the dabeb0e833b62db830c09ba24b5a778a5c478661 ref at commit dabeb0e833b6 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-09-06. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving semantica-agi/semantica to commit dabeb0e833b6, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a large codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 79.8% of all lines, comments represent 7.9%, and the repository averages 320 code lines per file. Python accounts for 79.7% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 371 | 178,844 | 151,239 | 7,051 | 20,554 |
| TSX | 43 | 20,932 | 19,365 | 129 | 1,438 |
| TypeScript | 32 | 8,742 | 7,902 | 23 | 817 |
| Jupyter Notebooks | 37 | 10,085 | 5,125 | 2,940 | 2,020 |
| JSON | 8 | 4,252 | 4,247 | 0 | 5 |
| YAML | 24 | 1,129 | 1,058 | 38 | 33 |
| CSS | 3 | 455 | 388 | 7 | 60 |
| TOML | 3 | 316 | 247 | 26 | 43 |
| Bicep | 1 | 132 | 122 | 1 | 9 |
| SVG | 4 | 74 | 61 | 7 | 6 |
| JavaScript | 2 | 30 | 28 | 0 | 2 |
| Dockerfile | 1 | 40 | 27 | 1 | 12 |

Top language (Python 79.7%). Generated at 2026-09-06T19:20:12.717233816+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/semantica-agi/semantica

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/semantica-agi/semantica/commit/dabeb0e833b62db830c09ba24b5a778a5c478661?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does semantica-agi/semantica have?

semantica-agi/semantica has 237,880 total lines, including 189,849 code lines, 18,682 comment lines, and 29,349 blank lines.

### How was the semantica-agi/semantica line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit dabeb0e833b6, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for semantica-agi/semantica?

This OctoCounts report was generated from dabeb0e833b62db830c09ba24b5a778a5c478661 at commit dabeb0e833b6 on 2026-09-06T19:20:12.717233816+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills](https://octocounts.com/github/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills) — Python, 193,574 code lines
- [rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch](https://octocounts.com/github/rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch) — Python, 184,686 code lines
- [AstrBotDevs/AstrBot](https://octocounts.com/github/AstrBotDevs/AstrBot) — Python, 196,166 code lines
- [PrefectHQ/fastmcp](https://octocounts.com/github/PrefectHQ/fastmcp) — Python, 196,705 code lines
- [plastic-labs/honcho](https://octocounts.com/github/plastic-labs/honcho) — Python, 197,322 code lines
- [crewaiinc/crewai](https://octocounts.com/github/crewaiinc/crewai) — Python, 198,571 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)