# starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline SLOC report

> As of 2026-08-29 (commit 743aa47c955e), starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline contains 666 total lines: 376 code, 161 comments, 129 blank, across 6 files in 4 languages (top: Python 94.4%). Custom configuration (tests excluded, docs excluded, generated excluded). Counted with tokei via OctoCounts.

starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline has 376 source lines of code out of 666 total lines across 6 files, counted from the main ref at commit 743aa47c955e by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-08-29. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline to commit 743aa47c955e, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a small codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 56.5% of all lines, comments represent 24.2%, and the repository averages 63 code lines per file. Python accounts for 94.4% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 1 | 423 | 355 | 12 | 56 |
| JSON | 1 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Markdown | 3 | 216 | 0 | 143 | 73 |
| Plain Text | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 |

Top language (Python 94.4%). Generated at 2026-08-29T13:57:18.946746310+00:00. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline/commit/743aa47c955e137b90a2a2b4d0969b52d483d3c4?analysis=%7B%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline have?

starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline has 666 total lines, including 376 code lines, 161 comment lines, and 129 blank lines.

### How was the starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 743aa47c955e, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for starchild-codes/semantic-saturation-pipeline?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 743aa47c955e on 2026-08-29T13:57:18.946746310+00:00.

## Similar repository reports

- [0xBlackash/CVE-2026-73296](https://octocounts.com/github/0xBlackash/CVE-2026-73296) — Python, 378 code lines
- [driscoll42/chicago-engineering-and-tech-communities](https://octocounts.com/github/driscoll42/chicago-engineering-and-tech-communities) — Python, 372 code lines
- [bablokb/circuitpython-pw-helper](https://octocounts.com/github/bablokb/circuitpython-pw-helper) — Python, 382 code lines
- [cmsax/cnki-converter](https://octocounts.com/github/cmsax/cnki-converter) — Python, 383 code lines
- [toml-lang/toml](https://octocounts.com/github/toml-lang/toml) — Python, 367 code lines
- [greatvovan/ios-backup-browser](https://octocounts.com/github/greatvovan/ios-backup-browser) — Python, 385 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)
