# zilliztech/memsearch SLOC report

> zilliztech/memsearch: 20,263 code lines at commit 00092f44d280, counted with tokei-14.0.0 on 2026-10-21. Saved result 31872dac368728134b9af4bb288ff18a946344b0ddc0cffe20685a272143299e.

zilliztech/memsearch has 20,263 source lines of code out of 31,746 total lines across 207 files, counted from the main ref at commit 00092f44d280 by the OctoCounts tokei engine on 2026-10-21. The report is cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so recounting the same revision returns exactly these numbers.

OctoCounts produced this report by resolving zilliztech/memsearch to commit 00092f44d280, downloading the repository source archive, and counting every source file with tokei, the open-source line counter written in Rust. The table below breaks the count down by programming language into files, total lines, code lines, comment lines, and blank lines, so the figures can be compared across languages and projects. Results are cached by commit, tokei version, and analysis options, so counting the same revision again reproduces exactly these numbers.

## Repository size insights

This is a medium-sized codebase by counted code lines. Code represents 63.8% of all lines, comments represent 22.6%, and the repository averages 98 code lines per file. Python accounts for 45.8% of counted code.

| Language | Files | Lines | Code | Comments | Blanks |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Python | 43 | 11,088 | 9,276 | 332 | 1,480 |
| JavaScript | 4 | 3,346 | 3,210 | 96 | 40 |
| TypeScript | 13 | 3,257 | 2,919 | 146 | 192 |
| Shell | 22 | 3,523 | 2,649 | 510 | 364 |
| JSON | 8 | 2,016 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 |
| YAML | 2 | 135 | 98 | 31 | 6 |
| TOML | 1 | 107 | 95 | 0 | 12 |
| Markdown | 90 | 7,176 | 0 | 5,111 | 2,065 |
| Plain Text | 24 | 1,098 | 0 | 942 | 156 |

Top language (Python 45.8%). Generated at 2026-10-21T02:09:12.102785913Z. Canonical report: https://octocounts.com/github/zilliztech/memsearch/commit/00092f44d2809676fe959f278432bc07c7cb159a?reportId=31872dac368728134b9af4bb288ff18a946344b0ddc0cffe20685a272143299e&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D

## Reproduce this report

[Reproduce this exact report and configuration](https://octocounts.com/github/zilliztech/memsearch/commit/00092f44d2809676fe959f278432bc07c7cb159a?reportId=31872dac368728134b9af4bb288ff18a946344b0ddc0cffe20685a272143299e&analysis=%7B%22profile%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22ignoredDirs%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeDocs%22%3Afalse%2C%22includeTests%22%3Afalse%2C%22ignoredLanguages%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22includeGenerated%22%3Afalse%7D).

## Report FAQ

### How many lines of code does zilliztech/memsearch have?

zilliztech/memsearch has 31,746 total lines, including 20,263 code lines, 7,168 comment lines, and 4,315 blank lines.

### How was the zilliztech/memsearch line count measured?

OctoCounts resolved the public GitHub repository to commit 00092f44d280, downloaded the source archive, counted it with tokei, and cached the report by commit, tokei version, and analysis options.

### What commit was counted for zilliztech/memsearch?

This OctoCounts report was generated from main at commit 00092f44d280 on 2026-10-21T02:09:12.102785913Z.

## Similar repository reports

- [sabbour/followcursor](https://octocounts.com/github/sabbour/followcursor) — Python, 20,326 code lines
- [GaimsDevSoftware/linuxpop](https://octocounts.com/github/GaimsDevSoftware/linuxpop) — Python, 20,165 code lines
- [AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo](https://octocounts.com/github/AstrBotDevs/shipyard-neo) — Python, 20,430 code lines
- [sanneel/dropos](https://octocounts.com/github/sanneel/dropos) — Python, 20,075 code lines
- [soundthing/Soundscape](https://octocounts.com/github/soundthing/Soundscape) — Python, 20,029 code lines
- [mvt-project/mvt](https://octocounts.com/github/mvt-project/mvt) — Python, 20,510 code lines

## Related OctoCounts pages

- [Recently analyzed repositories](https://octocounts.com/recent)
- [Popular SLOC reports](https://octocounts.com/popular)
- [Trending GitHub repositories](https://octocounts.com/trending)
- [Hall of Monoliths](https://octocounts.com/hall-of-monoliths)
- [TensorFlow vs PyTorch](https://octocounts.com/compare/tensorflow-vs-pytorch)
- [Django vs Ruby on Rails](https://octocounts.com/compare/django-vs-rails)
- [Laravel vs Django](https://octocounts.com/compare/laravel-vs-django)
- [GitHub SLOC counter guide](https://octocounts.com/docs/github-sloc-counter)
- [Counting methodology](https://octocounts.com/docs/methodology)
- [SLOC and code metrics glossary](https://octocounts.com/docs/glossary)
- [Original research: how filtering changes SLOC counts](https://octocounts.com/research)
- [OctoCounts API docs](https://octocounts.com/docs/api)